But I determined this with myself, that I would not come again to you in heaviness.
But I determined this with myself, that I would not come again to you in heaviness.
1. with myself—in contrast to
"you" (2 Corinthians 1:23). The
same antithesis between Paul and them appears in 2 Corinthians 1:23.
not come again . . . in
heaviness—"sorrow"; implying that he had already
paid them one visit in sorrow since his coming for the
first time to Corinth. At that visit he had warned them "he
would not spare if he should come again" (see on 2 Corinthians 1:23; compare 2 Corinthians 12:14;
2 Corinthians 13:1). See 2 Corinthians 13:1
to the first Epistle. The "in heaviness" implies mutual
pain; they grieving him, and he them. Compare 2 Corinthians 13:1, "I make you sorry," and 2 Corinthians 13:1, "If any have caused grief (sorrow)." In this verse
he accounts for having postponed his visit, following up 2 Corinthians 13:1.
For if I make you sorry, who is he then that maketh me glad, but the same which is made sorry by me?
2. For—proof that he shrinks
from causing them sorrow ("heaviness").
if I—The "I"
is emphatic. Some detractor may say that this () is not my reason for not coming as I proposed; since I
showed no scruple in causing "heaviness," or sorrow,
in my Epistle (the first Epistle to the Corinthians). But I answer,
If I be the one to cause you sorrow, it is not that I have any
pleasure in doing so. Nay, my object was that he "who was made
sorry by me" (namely, the Corinthians in general, ; but with tacit reference to the incestuous person in
particular) should repent, and so "make me glad," as
has actually taken place; "for . . . who is he then that?"
&c.
And I wrote this same unto you, lest, when I came, I should have sorrow from them of whom I ought to rejoice; having confidence in you all, that my joy is the joy of you all.
3. I wrote this same unto
you—namely, that I would not come to you then (), as, if I were to come then, it would have to be "in
heaviness" (causing sorrow both to him and them, owing to
their impenitent state). He refers to the first Epistle (compare ; compare 1 Corinthians 4:19;
1 Corinthians 4:21; 1 Corinthians 5:2-7;
1 Corinthians 5:13).
sorrow from them of whom I
ought to rejoice—that is, sorrow from their impenitence,
when he ought, on the contrary, to have joy from their
penitent obedience. The latter happy effect was produced by his first
Epistle, whereas the former would have been the result, had he then
visited them as he had originally proposed.
having confidence . . . that
my joy is the joy of you all—trusting that you, too, would feel
that there was sufficient reason for the postponement, if it
interfered with our mutual joy [ALFORD].
The communion of saints, he feels confident in them "ALL"
(his charity overlooking, for the moment the small section of his
detractors at Corinth, 1 Corinthians 13:7),
will make his joy (2 Corinthians 2:2)
their joy.
For out of much affliction and anguish of heart I wrote unto you with many tears; not that ye should be grieved, but that ye might know the love which I have more abundantly unto you.
4. So far from my change of
purpose being due to "lightness" (), I wrote my letter to you () "out of much affliction (Greek, 'trouble') and
anguish of heart, and with many tears."
not that ye should be
grieved—Translate, "be made sorry," to accord with
the translation, 2 Corinthians 2:2. My
ultimate and main object was, "not that ye might be made sorry,"
but that through sorrow you might be led to repentance, and so to
joy, redounding both to you and me (2 Corinthians 2:2;
2 Corinthians 2:3). I made you sorry before
going to you, that when I went it might not be necessary. He is
easily made sorry, who is admonished by a friend himself weeping
[BENGEL].
that ye might know the
love—of which it is a proof to rebuke sins openly and in season
[ESTIUS], (Psalms 141:5;
Proverbs 27:6). "Love" is
the source from which sincere reproof springs; that the Corinthians
might ultimately recognize this as his motive, was the apostle's aim.
which I have more abundantly
unto you—who have been particularly committed to me by God
(Acts 18:10; 1 Corinthians 4:15;
1 Corinthians 9:2).
But if any have caused grief, he hath not grieved me, but in part: that I may not overcharge you all.
5. grief . . . grieved—Translate
as before, "sorrow . . . made sorry." The "any"
is a delicate way of referring to the incestuous person.
not . . . me, but in part—He
has grieved me only in part (compare 2 Corinthians 1:14;
Romans 11:25), that is, I am not
the sole party aggrieved; most of you, also, were
aggrieved.
that I may not
overcharge—that I may not unduly lay the weight of the charge
on you all, which I should do, if I made myself to be the sole party
aggrieved. ALFORD
punctuates, "He hath not made sorry me, but in part (that I
press not too heavily; namely, on him) you all." Thus "you
all" is in contrast to "me"; and "in part"
is explained in the parenthetical clause.
Sufficient to such a man is this punishment, which was inflicted of many.
6. Sufficient—without
increasing it, which would only drive him to despair (), whereas the object of the punishment was, "that (his)
spirit might be saved" in the last day.
to such a man—a milder
designation of the offender than if he had been named [MEYER].
Rather, it expresses estrangement from such a one who had
caused such grief to the Church, and scandal to religion (Acts 22:22;
1 Corinthians 5:5).
this punishment—His
being "delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh";
not only excommunication, but bodily disease (see on 1 Corinthians 5:5).
inflicted of many—rather,
"by the majority" (the more part of you). Not by an
individual priest, as in the Church of Rome, nor by the bishops and
clergy alone, but by the whole body of the Church.
So that contrariwise ye ought rather to forgive him, and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow.
7. with overmuch sorrow—Greek,
"with HIS overmuch
sorrow."
Wherefore I beseech you that ye would confirm your love toward him.
8. confirm your love toward him—by
giving effect in act, and showing in deeds your love; namely, by
restoring him to your fellowship and praying for his recovering from
the sickness penally inflicted on him.
For to this end also did I write, that I might know the proof of you, whether ye be obedient in all things.
9. For—Additional reason why
they should restore the offender, namely, as a "proof" of
their obedience "in all things"; now in love, as
previously in punishing (), at the apostle's desire. Besides his other reasons for
deferring his visit, he had the further view, though, perhaps,
unperceived by them, of making an experiment of their fidelity. This
accounts for his deferring to give, in his Epistle, the reason
for his change of plan (resolved on before writing it). This full
discovery of his motive comes naturally from him now, in the second
Epistle, after he had seen the success of his measures, but would not
have been a seasonable communication before. All this accords with
reality, and is as remote as possible from imposture [PALEY,
Horæ Paulinæ]. The interchange of feeling is marked (), "I wrote . . . that ye might know the love,"
&c.: here, "I did write, that I might know the proof
of you."
To whom ye forgive any thing, I forgive also: for if I forgave any thing, to whom I forgave it, for your sakes forgave I it in the person of Christ;
10. Another encouragement to
their taking on themselves the responsibility of restoring the
offender. They may be assured of Paul's apostolic sanction to their
doing so.
for if I forgave anything, to
whom I forgave it—The oldest manuscripts read, "For even
what I have forgiven, if I have forgiven anything."
for your sakes forgave
I it —He uses the past tense, as of a thing already
determined on; as in 1 Corinthians 5:3, "I
have judged already"; or, as speaking generally of forgiveness
granted, or to be granted. It is for your sakes I have forgiven, and
do forgive, that the Church (of which you are constituent members)
may suffer no hurt by the loss of a soul, and that ye may learn
leniency as well as faithfulness.
in the person of
Christ—representing Christ, and acting by His authority:
answering to 1 Corinthians 5:4, "In
the name of our Lord Jesus Christ . . . my spirit, with the power of
our Lord Jesus Christ."
Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices.
11. Literally, "That we may
have no advantage gained over us by Satan," namely, by letting
one of our members be lost to us through despair, we ourselves
furnishing Satan with the weapon, by our repulsive harshness to one
now penitent. The loss of a single sinner is a common loss;
therefore, in 2 Corinthians 2:10, he
said, "for your sakes." Paul had "delivered" the
offender "to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the
Spirit might be saved" (2 Corinthians 2:10). Satan sought to destroy the spirit also: to let him do so,
would be to give him an advantage, and let him overreach us.
not ignorant of his
devices—"Ignorant" and "devices" are words
akin in sound and root in Greek: we are not without knowledge
of his knowing schemes.
Furthermore, when I came to Troas to preach Christ's gospel, and a door was opened unto me of the Lord,
12. Paul expected to meet Titus
at Troas, to receive the tidings as to the effect of his first
Epistle on the Corinthian Church; but, disappointed in his
expectation there, he passed on to Macedonia, where he met him
at last (2 Corinthians 7:5; 2 Corinthians 7:6;
2 Corinthians 7:7) The history
(Acts) does not record his passing through Troas, in going from
Ephesus to Macedonia; but it does in coming from that
country (Acts 20:6); also, that
he had disciples there (Acts 20:7),
which accords with the Epistle (Acts 20:7, "a door was opened unto me of the Lord"). An
undesigned coincidence marking genuineness [PALEY,
Horæ Paulinæ]. Doubtless Paul had fixed a time with Titus to
meet him at Troas; and had desired him, if detained so as not to be
able to be at Troas at that time, to proceed at once to Macedonia to
Philippi, the next station on his own journey. Hence, though a wide
door of Christian usefulness opened to him at Troas, his eagerness to
hear from Titus the tidings from Corinth, led him not to stay longer
there when the time fixed was past, but he hastened on to Macedonia
to meet him there [BIRKS].
to preach
—literally, "for the Gospel." He had been at Troas
before, but the vision of a man from Macedonia inviting him to come
over, prevented his remaining there (Acts 20:7). On his return to Asia, after the longer visit mentioned
here, he stayed seven days (Acts 20:7).
and—that is, though
Paul would, under ordinary circumstances, have gladly stayed in
Troas.
door . . . opened . . . of
the Lord—Greek, "in the Lord," that is,
in His work, and by His gracious Providence.
I had no rest in my spirit, because I found not Titus my brother: but taking my leave of them, I went from thence into Macedonia.
13. no rest in my spirit—rather,
"no rest for my spirit" (). As here his "spirit" had no rest; so in , his "flesh." His "spirit" under the Holy
Spirit, hence, concluded that it was not necessary to avail himself
of the "door" of usefulness at Troas any longer.
taking . . . leave of
them—the disciples at Troas.
Now thanks be unto God, which always causeth us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of his knowledge by us in every place.
14. Now—Greek, "But."
Though we left Troas disappointed in not meeting Titus there, and in
having to leave so soon so wide a door, "thanks be unto God,"
we were triumphantly blessed in both the good news of you from Titus,
and in the victories of the Gospel everywhere in our progress. The
cause of triumph cannot be restricted (as ALFORD
explains) to the former; for "always," and "in every
place," show that the latter also is intended.
causeth us to triumph—The
Greek, is rather, as in , "triumphs over us": "leadeth us in triumph."
Paul regarded himself as a signal trophy of God's victorious power in
Christ. His Almighty Conqueror was leading him about, through all the
cities of the Greek and Roman world, as an illustrious example of His
power at once to subdue and to save. The foe of Christ was now the
servant of Christ. As to be led in triumph by man is the most
miserable, so to be led in triumph by God is the most glorious, lot
that can befall any [TRENCH].
Our only true triumphs are God's triumphs over us. His defeats of us
are our only true victories [ALFORD].
The image is taken from the triumphal procession of a victorious
general. The additional idea is perhaps included, which
distinguishes God's triumph from that of a human general, that the
captive is brought into willing obedience () to Christ, and so joins in the triumph: God "leads
him in triumph" as one not merely triumphed over, but
also as one triumphing over God's foes with God (which last
will apply to the apostle's triumphant missionary progress under the
leading of God). So BENGEL:
"Who shows us in triumph, not [merely] as conquered, but
as the ministers of His victory. Not only the victory, but the open
'showing' of the victory is marked: for there follows, Who maketh
manifest."
savour—retaining the
image of a triumph. As the approach of the triumphal procession was
made known by the odor of incense scattered far and wide by
the incense-bearers in the train, so God "makes manifest by us"
(His now at once triumphed over and triumphing captives, compare , "Catch," literally, "Take captive so as to
preserve alive") the sweet savor of the knowledge of Christ, the
triumphant Conqueror (Colossians 2:15),
everywhere. As the triumph strikes the eyes, so the savor the
nostrils; thus every sense feels the power of Christ's Gospel. This
manifestation (a word often recurring in his Epistles to the
Corinthians, compare 1 Corinthians 4:5)
refutes the Corinthian suspicions of his dishonestly, by
reserve, hiding anything from them (2 Corinthians 2:17;
2 Corinthians 4:2).
For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish:
15. The order is in Greek,
"For (it is) of Christ (that) we are a sweet savor unto God";
thus, the "for" justifies his previous words (), "the savor of HIS
(Christ's) knowledge." We not only scatter the savor; but "we
are the sweet savor" itself (; compare John 1:14;
John 1:16; Ephesians 5:2;
1 John 2:27).
in them that are
saved—rather, "that are being saved . . . that are
perishing" (see on 1 John 2:27).
As the light, though it blinds in darkness the weak, is for all that
still light; and honey, though it taste bitter to the sick, is in
itself still sweet; so the Gospel is still of a sweet savor, though
many perish through unbelief [CHRYSOSTOM,
Homilies, 5.467], (2 Corinthians 4:3;
2 Corinthians 4:4; 2 Corinthians 4:6).
As some of the conquered foes led in triumph were put to death when
the procession reached the capitol, and to them the smell of the
incense was the "savor of death unto death," while to those
saved alive, it was the "savor of life," so the Gospel was
to the different classes respectively.
and in them—in the case
of them. "Those being saved" (2 Corinthians 4:6): "Those that are perishing" (2 Corinthians 4:6).
To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?
16. savour of death unto death . . .
of life unto life—an odor arising out of death (a
mere announcement of a dead Christ, and a virtually lifeless
Gospel, in which light unbelievers regard the Gospel message), ending
(as the just and natural consequence) in death (to the
unbeliever); (but to the believer) an odor arising out of
life (that is, the announcement of a risen and living
Saviour), ending in life (to the believer) (Matthew 21:44;
Luke 2:34; John 9:39).
who is sufficient for these
things?—namely, for diffusing aright everywhere the savor of
Christ, so diverse in its effects on believers and unbelievers. He
here prepares the way for one purpose of his Epistle, namely, to
vindicate his apostolic mission from its detractors at Corinth, who
denied his sufficiency. The Greek order puts prominently
foremost the momentous and difficult task assigned to him, "For
these things, who is sufficient?" He answers his own question
(2 Corinthians 3:5; 2 Corinthians 3:6),
"Not that we are sufficient of ourselves, but our
sufficiency is of God, who hath made us able (Greek,
'sufficient') ministers," &c.
For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
17. not as many— (2 Corinthians 11:18;
Philippians 2:21). Rather, "the
many," namely, the false teachers of whom he treats
(tenth through twelfth chapters, especially 2 Corinthians 11:13;
1 Thessalonians 2:3).
which corrupt—Greek,
"adulterating, as hucksters do wine for gain" (2 Corinthians 4:2;
Isaiah 1:22; 2 Peter 2:3,
"Make merchandise of you").
as of sincerity . . . as of
God—as one speaking from (out of) sincerity, as from (that is,
by the command of, and so in dependence on) God.
in Christ's—as united
to Him in living membership, and doing His work (compare 2 Peter 2:3). The whole Gospel must be delivered such as it is,
without concession to men's corruptions, and without selfish aims, if
it is to be blessed with success (2 Peter 2:3).