Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)
Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)
1. apostle—in the earliest
Epistles, the two to the Thessalonians, through humility, he uses no
title of authority; but associates with him "Silvanus and
Timotheus"; yet here, though "brethren" () are with him, he does not name them but puts his own
name and apostleship prominent: evidently because his apostolic
commission needs now to be vindicated against deniers of it.
of—Greek,
"from." Expressing the origin from which his mission
came, "not from men," but from Christ and the Father
(understood) as the source. "By" expresses the immediate
operating agent in the call. Not only was the call from God as
its ultimate source, but by Christ and the Father as the
immediate agent in calling him (Acts 22:15;
Acts 26:16-18). The laying
on of Ananias' hands (Acts 9:17)
is no objection to this; for that was but a sign of the fact, not an
assisting cause. So the Holy Ghost calls him specially (Acts 13:2;
Acts 13:3); he was an apostle
before this special mission.
man—singular; to mark
the contrast to "Jesus Christ." The opposition between
"Christ" and "man," and His name being put in
closest connection with God the Father, imply His Godhead.
raised him from the
dead—implying that, though he had not seen Him in His
humiliation as the other apostles (which was made an objection
against him), he had seen and been constituted an apostle by Him
in His resurrection power (Matthew 28:18;
Romans 1:4; Romans 1:5).
Compare as to the ascension, the consequence of the resurrection, and
the cause of His giving "apostles," Romans 1:5. He rose again, too, for our justification (Romans 1:5); thus Paul prepares the way for the prominent subject of
the Epistle, justification in Christ, not by the law.
And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia:
2. all the brethren—I am not
alone in my doctrine; all my colleagues in the Gospel work,
travelling with me (Acts 19:29,
Gaius and Aristarchus at Ephesus: Acts 19:29, Sopater, Secundus, Timotheus, Tychicus, Trophimus, some, or
all of these), join with me. Not that these were joint authors
with Paul of the Epistle: but joined him in the sentiments and
salutations. The phrase, "all the brethren," accords
with a date when he had many travelling companions, he and they
having to bear jointly the collection to Jerusalem [CONYBEARE
and HOWSON].
the churches—Pessinus
and Ancyra were the principal cities; but doubtless there were many
other churches in Galatia (Acts 18:23;
1 Corinthians 16:1). He does not attach any
honorable title to the churches here, as elsewhere, being displeased
at their Judaizing. See First Corinthians; First Thessalonians, &c.
The first Epistle of Peter is addressed to Jewish Christians
sojourning in Galatia (1 Peter 1:1),
among other places mentioned. It is interesting thus to find the
apostle of the circumcision, as well as the apostle of the
uncircumcision, once at issue (1 Peter 1:1), co-operating to build up the same churches.
Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ,
3. from . . . from
—Omit the second "from." The Greek joins God
the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ in closet union, by there being
but the one preposition.
Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father:
4. gave himself— (); unto death, as an offering. Found only in this and the
Pastoral Epistles. The Greek is different in (see on ).
for our sins—which
enslaved us to the present evil world.
deliver us from this—Greek,
"out of the," c. The Father and Son are each said to
"deliver us," &c. (): but the Son, not the Father, gave Himself for us in
order to do so, and make us citizens of a better world (). The Galatians in desiring to return to legal bondage are,
he implies, renouncing the deliverance which Christ wrought
for us. This he more fully repeats in . "Deliver" is the very word used by the Lord as to
His deliverance of Paul himself (): an undesigned coincidence between Paul and Luke.
world—Greek,
"age" system or course of the world, regarded
from a religious point of view. The present age opposes the
"glory" (Galatians 1:5) of
God, and is under the authority of the Evil One. The "ages of
ages" (Greek, Galatians 1:5)
are opposed to "the present evil age."
according to the will of God
and our Father—Greek, "of Him who is at once God
[the sovereign Creator] and our Father" (John 6:38;
John 6:39; John 10:18,
end). Without merit of ours. His sovereignty as "GOD,"
and our filial relation to Him as "OUR
FATHER," ought to
keep us from blending our own legal notions (as the Galatians were
doing) with His will and plan. This paves the way for his argument.
To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
5. be
glory—rather, as Greek, "be the glory";
the glory which is peculiarly and exclusively His. Compare Note,
see on .
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
6. Without the usual expressions
of thanksgiving for their faith, c., he vehemently plunges into his
subject, zealous for "the glory" of God (), which was being disparaged by the Galatians falling away
from the pure Gospel of the "grace" of God.
I marvel—implying that
he had hoped better things from them, whence his sorrowful surprise
at their turning out so different from his expectations.
so soon—after my last
visit when I hoped and thought you were untainted by the Judaizing
teachers. If this Epistle was written from Corinth, the interval
would be a little more than three years, which would be "soon"
to have fallen away, if they were apparently sound at the time of his
visit. Galatians 4:18; Galatians 4:20
may imply that he saw no symptom of unsoundness then, such as
he hears of in them now. But English Version is
probably not correct there. See see on Galatians 4:20; Galatians 4:20; also see
Galatians 4:20 If from Ephesus, the
interval would be not more than one year. BIRKS
holds the Epistle to have been written from Corinth after his FIRST
visit to Galatia; for this agrees best with the "so soon"
here: with Galatians 4:18, "It is
good to be zealously affected always in a good thing, and not only
when I am present with you." If they had persevered in the faith
during three years of his first absence, and only turned aside after
his second visit, they could not be charged justly with adhering to
the truth only when he was present: for his first absence was longer
than both his visits, and they would have obeyed longer in his
"absence" than in his "presence."
But if their decline had begun immediately after he left them, and
before his return to them, the reproof will be just. But see on Galatians 4:18.
removed—Translate, "are
being removed," that is, ye are suffering yourselves so soon
(whether from the time of my last visit, or from the time of the
first temptation held out to you) [PARÆUS]
to be removed by Jewish seducers. Thus he softens the censure
by implying that the Galatians were tempted by seducers from without,
with whom the chief guilt lay: and the present, "ye are being
removed," implies that their seduction was only in process of
being effected, not that it was actually effected. WAHL,
ALFORD, and others take
the Greek as middle voice. "ye are removing" or
"passing over." "Shifting your ground" [CONYBEARE
and HOWSON]. But thus the
point of Paul's oblique reference to their misleaders is lost; and in
Hebrews 7:12 the Greek is
used passively, justifying its being taken so here. On the
impulsiveness and fickleness of the Gauls (another form of Kel-t-s,
the progenitors of the Erse, Gauls, Cymri, and Belgians), whence the
Galatians sprang, see Hebrews 7:12
and CÆSAR [Commentaries
on the Gallic War, 3.19].
from him that called you—God
the Father (Galatians 1:15; Galatians 5:8;
Romans 8:30; 1 Corinthians 1:9;
1 Thessalonians 2:12; 1 Thessalonians 5:24).
into—rather, as Greek,
"IN the grace of
Christ," as the element in which, and the instrument
by which, God calls us to salvation. Compare Note, see on
1 Thessalonians 5:24; 1 Thessalonians 5:24, "the gift by (Greek, 'in') grace (Greek,
'the grace') of (the) one man." "The grace of
Christ," is Christ's gratuitously purchased and bestowed
justification, reconciliation, and eternal life.
another—rather, as
Greek, "a second and different gospel," that
is, into a so-called gospel, different altogether from the
only true Gospel.
Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
7. another—A distinct Greek
word from that in Galatians 1:6. Though
I called it a gospel (Galatians 1:6),
it is not really so. There is really but one Gospel, and no
other gospel.
but—Translate, "Only
that there are some that trouble you," c. (Galatians 5:10
Galatians 5:12). All I meant by the
"different gospel" was nothing but a perversion by "some"
of the one Gospel of Christ.
would pervert—Greek,
"wish to pervert"; they could not really pervert the
Gospel, though they could pervert Gospel professors (compare Galatians 4:9;
Galatians 4:17; Galatians 4:21;
Galatians 6:12; Galatians 6:13;
Colossians 2:18). Though acknowledging
Christ, they insisted on circumcision and Jewish ordinances and
professed to rest on the authority of other apostles, namely, Peter
and James. But Paul recognizes no gospel, save the pure Gospel.
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
8. But—however weighty they
may seem "who trouble you." Translate as Greek,
"Even though we," namely, I and the brethren with me,
weighty and many as we are (Galatians 1:1;
Galatians 1:2). The Greek
implies a case supposed which never has occurred.
angel—in which light ye
at first received me (compare Galatians 4:14;
1 Corinthians 13:1), and whose authority is
the highest possible next to that of God and Christ. A new
revelation, even though seemingly accredited by miracles, is not to
be received if it contradict the already existing revelation. For God
cannot contradict Himself (Deuteronomy 13:1-3;
1 Kings 13:18; Matthew 24:24;
2 Thessalonians 2:9). The Judaizing teachers
sheltered themselves under the names of the great apostles, James,
John, and Peter: "Do not bring these names up to me, for even if
an angel," &c. Not that he means, the apostles really
supported the Judaizers: but he wishes to show, when the truth is in
question, respect of persons is inadmissible [CHRYSOSTOM].
preach—that is, "should
preach."
any other gospel . . .
than—The Greek expresses not so much "any other
gospel different from what we have preached," as, "any
gospel BESIDE that which
we preached." This distinctly opposes the traditions of the
Church of Rome, which are at once besides and against
(the Greek includes both ideas) the written Word, our only
"attested rule."
As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
9. said before—when we were
visiting you (so "before" means, ). Compare Galatians 5:2;
Galatians 5:3; Galatians 5:21.
Translate, "If any man preacheth unto you any gospel
BESIDE that which,"
c. Observe the indicative, not the subjunctive or conditional mood,
is used, "preacheth," literally, "furnisheth you with
any gospel." The fact is assumed, not merely supposed as
a contingency, as in Galatians 1:8,
"preach," or "should preach." This implies that
he had already observed (namely, during his last visit) the
machinations of the Judaizing teachers: but his surprise (Galatians 1:8) now at the Galatians being misled by them, implies
that they had not apparently been so then. As in Galatians 1:8 he had said, "which we preached," so here, with an
augmentation of the force, "which ye received"
acknowledging that they had truly accepted it.
accursed—The opposite
appears in Galatians 6:16.
For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
10. For—accounting for the
strong language he has just used.
do I now—resuming the
"now" of Galatians 1:9. "Am
I now persuading men?" [ALFORD],
that is, conciliating. Is what I have just now said a sample
of men-pleasing, of which I am accused? His adversaries accused him
of being an interested flatterer of men, "becoming all things to
all men," to make a party for himself, and so observing the law
among the Jews (for instance, circumcising Timothy), yet persuading
the Gentiles to renounce it (Galatians 1:9) (in order to flatter those, really keeping them in a
subordinate state, not admitted to the full privileges which the
circumcised alone enjoyed). NEANDER
explains the "now" thus: Once, when a Pharisee, I was
actuated only by a regard to human authority and to please men
(Luke 16:15; John 5:44),
but NOW I teach as
responsible to God alone (1 Corinthians 4:3).
or God?—Regard is to be
had to God alone.
for if I yet pleased men—The
oldest manuscripts omit "for." "If I were still
pleasing men," c. (Luke 6:26
John 15:19; 1 Thessalonians 2:4;
James 4:4; 1 John 4:5).
On "yet," compare 1 John 4:5.
servant of Christ—and
so pleasing Him in all things (Titus 2:9;
Colossians 3:22).
But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
11. certify—I made known to
you as to the Gospel which was preached by me, that it is not after
man, that is, not of, by, or from man (Galatians 1:1;
Galatians 1:12). It is not according
to man; not influenced by mere human considerations, as it would be,
if it were of human origin.
brethren—He not till
now calls them so.
For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
12. Translate, "For not
even did I myself (any more than the other apostles)
receive it from man, nor was I taught it (by man)."
"Received it," implies the absence of labor in acquiring
it. "Taught it," implies the labor of learning.
by the revelation of Jesus
Christ—Translate, "by revelation of [that is, from] Jesus
Christ." By His revealing it to me. Probably this took place
during the three years, in part of which he sojourned in Arabia
(Galatians 1:17; Galatians 1:18),
in the vicinity of the scene of the giving of the law; a fit place
for such a revelation of the Gospel of grace, which supersedes the
ceremonial law (Galatians 4:25). He,
like other Pharisees who embraced Christianity, did not at first
recognize its independence of the Mosaic law, but combined both
together. Ananias, his first instructor, was universally esteemed for
his legal piety and so was not likely to have taught him to sever
Christianity from the law. This severance was partially recognized
after the martyrdom of Stephen. But Paul received it by special
revelation (1 Corinthians 11:23; 1 Corinthians 15:3;
1 Thessalonians 4:15). A vision of the Lord
Jesus is mentioned (Acts 22:18),
at his first visit to Jerusalem (Acts 22:18); but this seems to have been subsequent to the revelation
here meant (compare Acts 22:18), and to have been confined to giving a particular
command. The vision "fourteen years before" (Acts 22:18) was in A.D. 43,
still later, six years after his conversion. Thus Paul is an
independent witness to the Gospel. Though he had received no
instruction from the apostles, but from the Holy Ghost, yet when he
met them his Gospel exactly agreed with theirs.
For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:
13. heard—even before I came
among you.
conversation—"my
former way of life."
Jews' religion—The
term, "Hebrew," expresses the language;
"Jew," the nationality, as distinguished from the
Gentiles; "Israelite," the highest title, the religious
privileges, as a member of the theocracy.
the church—Here
singular, marking its unity, though constituted of many particular
churches, under the one Head, Christ.
of God—added to mark
the greatness of his sinful alienation from God ().
wasted—laid it waste:
the opposite of "building it up."
And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.
14. profited—Greek, "I
was becoming a proficient"; "I made progress."
above—beyond.
my equals—Greek,
"Of mine own age, among my countrymen."
traditions of my
fathers—namely, those of the Pharisees, Paul being "a
Pharisee, and son of a Pharisee" (Acts 23:6;
Acts 26:5). "MY fathers,"
shows that it is not to be understood generally of the traditions of
the nation.
But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace,
15. separated—"set me
apart": in the purposes of His electing love (compare Acts 9:15;
Acts 22:14), in order to show in
me His "pleasure," which is the farthest
point that any can reach in inquiring the causes of his salvation.
The actual "separating" or "setting apart" to the
work marked out for him, is mentioned in Acts 13:2;
Romans 1:1. There is an allusion,
perhaps, in the way of contrast, to the derivation of Pharisee from
Hebrew, "pharash," "separated." I
was once a so-called Pharisee or Separatist, but God had
separated me to something far better.
from . . . womb—Thus
merit in me was out of the question, in assigning causes for His call
from Acts 9:11. Grace is the sole
cause (Psalms 22:9; Psalms 71:6;
Isaiah 49:1; Isaiah 49:5;
Jeremiah 1:5; Luke 1:15).
called me—on the way to
Damascus (Acts 9:3-8).
To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:
16. reveal his Son in me—within
me, in my inmost soul, by the Holy Spirit (). Compare 2 Corinthians 4:6,
"shined in our hearts." The revealing of His Son by me to
the Gentiles (so translate for "heathen") was impossible,
unless He had first revealed His Son in me; at first on my
conversion, but especially at the subsequent revelation from Jesus
Christ (Galatians 1:12), whereby I
learned the Gospel's independence of the Mosaic law.
that I might preach—the
present in the Greek, which includes the idea "that I may
preach Him," implying an office still continuing. This
was the main commission entrusted to him (Galatians 2:7;
Galatians 2:9).
immediately—connected
chiefly with "I went into Arabia" (Galatians 2:9). It denotes the sudden fitness of the apostle. So Galatians 2:9, "Straightway he preached Christ in the
synagogue."
I conferred not—Greek,
"I had not further (namely, in addition to revelation) recourse
to . . . for the purpose of consulting." The divine revelation
was sufficient for me [BENGEL].
flesh and blood— (Galatians 2:9).
Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.
17. went I up—Some of the
oldest manuscripts read, "went away."
to Jerusalem—the seat
of the apostles.
into Arabia—This
journey (not recorded in Acts) was during the whole period of his
stay at Damascus, called by Luke (), "many [Greek, a considerable number of] days."
It is curiously confirmatory of the legitimacy of taking "many
days" to stand for "three years," that the same phrase
exactly occurs in the same sense in 1 Kings 2:38;
1 Kings 2:39. This was a country of
the Gentiles; here doubtless he preached as he did before and
after (Acts 9:20; Acts 9:22)
at Damascus: thus he shows the independence of his apostolic
commission. He also here had that comparative retirement needed,
after the first fervor of his conversion, to prepare him for the
great work before him. Compare Moses (Acts 7:29;
Acts 7:30). His familiarity with
the scene of the giving of the law, and the meditations and
revelations which he had there, appear in Galatians 4:24;
Galatians 4:25; Hebrews 12:18.
See on Galatians 1:12. The Lord from
heaven communed with him, as He on earth in the days of His flesh
communed with the other apostles.
returned—Greek
"returned back again."
Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.
18. after three years—dating
from my conversion, as appears by the contrast to "immediately"
(Galatians 1:16). This is the same
visit to Jerusalem as in Acts 9:26,
and at this visit occurred the vision (Acts 22:17;
Acts 22:18). The incident which
led to his leaving Damascus (Acts 9:25;
2 Corinthians 11:33) was not the main cause
of his going to Jerusalem. So that there is no discrepancy in
the statement here that he went "to see Peter"; or rather,
as Greek, "to make the acquaintance of"; "to
become personally acquainted with." The two oldest manuscripts
read, "Cephas," the name given Peter elsewhere in the
Epistle, the Hebrew name; as Peter is the Greek
(John 1:42). Appropriate to the
view of him here as the apostle especially of the Hebrews. It is
remarkable that Peter himself, in his Epistles, uses the Greek
name Peter, perhaps to mark his antagonism to the Judaizers
who would cling to the Hebraic form. He was prominent among the
apostles, though James, as bishop of Jerusalem, had the chief
authority there (Matthew 16:18).
abode—or "tarried"
[ELLICOTT].
fifteen days—only
fifteen days; contrasting with the long period of three years,
during which, previously, he had exercised an independent commission
in preaching: a fact proving on the face of it, how little he owed to
Peter in regard to his apostolical authority or instruction. The
Greek for "to see," at the same time implies
visiting a person important to know, such as Peter was. The
plots of the Jews prevented him staying longer (Matthew 16:18). Also, the vision directing him to depart to the Gentiles,
for that the people of Jerusalem would not receive his testimony
(Acts 22:17; Acts 22:18).
But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.
19. Compare Acts 9:27;
Acts 9:28, wherein Luke, as an
historian, describes more generally what Paul, the subject of the
history, himself details more particularly. The history speaks of
"apostles"; and Paul's mention of a second apostle,
besides Peter, reconciles the Epistle and the history. At Stephen's
martyrdom, and the consequent persecution, the other ten apostles,
agreeably to Christ's directions, seem to have soon (though
not immediately, Acts 8:14)
left Jerusalem to preach elsewhere. James remained in charge of the
mother church, as its bishop. Peter, the apostle of the circumcision,
was present during Paul's fifteen days' stay; but he, too, presently
after (Acts 9:32), went on a
circuit through Judea.
James, the Lord's
brother—This designation, to distinguish him from James the son
of Zebedee, was appropriate while that apostle was alive. But before
Paul's second visit to Jerusalem (Galatians 2:1;
Acts 15:1-4), he had been
beheaded by Herod (Acts 12:2).
Accordingly, in the subsequent mention of James here (Galatians 2:9;
Galatians 2:12), he is not designated
by this distinctive epithet: a minute, undesigned coincidence, and
proof of genuineness. James was the Lord's brother, not in our strict
sense, but in the sense, "cousin," or "kinsman"
(Matthew 28:10; John 20:17).
His brethren are never called "sons of Joseph," which they
would have been had they been the Lord's brothers strictly. However,
compare Psalms 69:8, "I am an
alien to my mother's children." In John 7:3;
John 7:5, the "brethren"
who believed not in Him may mean His near relations, not
including the two of His brethren, that is, relatives (James and
Jude) who were among the Twelve apostles. John 7:5, "His brethren," refer to Simon and Joses, and
others (Matthew 13:55) of His
kinsmen, who were not apostles. It is not likely there would be two
pairs of brothers named alike, of such eminence as James and Jude;
the likelihood is that the apostles James and Jude are also the
writers of the Epistles, and the brethren of Jesus. James and Joses
were sons of Alpheus and Mary, sister of the Virgin Mary.
Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.
20. Solemn asseveration that his
statement is true that his visit was but for fifteen days and that he
saw no apostle save Peter and James. Probably it had been reported by
Judaizers that he had received a long course of instruction from the
apostles in Jerusalem from the first; hence his earnestness in
asserting the contrary facts.
Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia;
21. I came into . . . Syria and
Cilicia—"preaching the faith" (), and so, no doubt, founding the churches in Syria and
Cilicia, which he subsequently confirmed in the faith (Acts 15:23;
Acts 15:41). He probably went
first to Cæsarea, the main seaport, and thence by sea to Tarsus of
Cilicia, his native place (Acts 15:41), and thence to Syria; Cilicia having its geographical
affinities with Syria, rather than with Asia Minor, as the Tarsus
mountains separate it from the latter. His placing "Syria"
in the order of words before "Cilicia," is due to Antioch
being a more important city than Tarsus, as also to his longer stay
in the former city. Also "Syria and Cilicia," from their
close geographical connection, became a generic geographical phrase,
the more important district being placed first [CONYBEARE
and HOWSON]. This sea
journey accounts for his being "unknown by face to the churches
of Judea" (Galatians 1:22). He
passes by in silence his second visit, with alms, to Judea and
Jerusalem (Acts 11:30);
doubtless because it was for a limited and special object, and would
occupy but a few days (Acts 12:25),
as there raged at Jerusalem at the time a persecution in which James,
the brother of John, was martyred, and Peter was m prison, and James
seems to have been the only apostle present (Acts 12:25); so it was needless to mention this visit, seeing that he
could not at such a time have received the instructions which the
Galatians alleged he had derived from the primary fountains of
authority, the apostles.
And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:
22. So far was I from being a
disciple of the apostles, that I was even unknown in the churches
of Judea (excepting Jerusalem, ), which were the chief scene of their labors.
But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.
23. Translate as Greek,
"They were hearing": tidings were brought them from time to
time [CONYBEARE and
HOWSON].
he which persecuted us in
times past—"our former persecutor" [ALFORD].
The designation by which he was known among Christians still better
than by his name "Saul."
destroyed—Greek,
"was destroying."
And they glorified God in me.
24. in me—"in my case."
"Having understood the entire change, and that the former wolf
is now acting the shepherd's part, they received occasion for joyful
thanksgiving to God in respect to me" [THEODORET].
How different, he implies to the Galatians, their spirit from
yours!