There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh; for he was the firstborn of Joseph; to wit, for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead: because he was a man of war, therefore he had Gilead and Bashan.
There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh; for he was the firstborn of Joseph; to wit, for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead: because he was a man of war, therefore he had Gilead and Bashan.
1-6. There was also a lot for the
tribe of Manasseh—Ephraim was mentioned, as the more numerous
and powerful branch of the family of Joseph (Genesis 48:19;
Genesis 48:20); but Manasseh still
retained the right of primogeniture and had a separate inheritance
assigned.
Machir—his descendants.
the father of Gilead—Though
he had a son of that name (Numbers 26:29;
Numbers 27:1), yet, as is evident from
the use of the Hebrew article, reference is made, not to the person,
but the province of Gilead. "Father" here means lord or
possessor of Gilead. This view is confirmed by the fact that it was
not Machir, but his descendants, who subdued Gilead and Bashan
(Numbers 32:41; Deuteronomy 3:13-15).
These Machirites had their portion on the east side of Jordan. The
western portion of land, allotted to the tribe of Manasseh, was
divided into ten portions because the male descendants who had sons
consisted of five families, to which, consequently, five shares were
given; and the sixth family, namely, the posterity of Hepher, being
all women, the five daughters of Zelophehad were, on application to
the valuators, endowed each with an inheritance in land (see on Deuteronomy 3:13-5).
Deuteronomy 3:13-5. THIS COAST.
There was also a lot for the rest of the children of Manasseh by their families; for the children of Abiezer, and for the children of Helek, and for the children of Asriel, and for the children of Shechem, and for the children of Hepher, and for the children of Shemida: these were the male children of Manasseh the son of Joseph by their families.
But Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, had no sons, but daughters: and these are the names of his daughters, Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.
And they came near before Eleazar the priest, and before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the princes, saying, The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brethren. Therefore according to the commandment of the LORD he gave them an inheritance among the brethren of their father.
And there fell ten portions to Manasseh, beside the land of Gilead and Bashan, which were on the other side Jordan;
Because the daughters of Manasseh had an inheritance among his sons: and the rest of Manasseh's sons had the land of Gilead.
And the coast of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethah, that lieth before Shechem; and the border went along on the right hand unto the inhabitants of En-tappuah.
7-11. the coast of Manasseh was from
Asher to Michmethah—The southern boundary is here traced from
the east. Asher (now Yasir), the starting point, was a town fifteen
Roman miles east of Shechem, and anciently a place of importance.
Now Manasseh had the land of Tappuah: but Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children of Ephraim;
And the coast descended unto the river Kanah, southward of the river: these cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh: the coast of Manasseh also was on the north side of the river, and the outgoings of it were at the sea:
9. the coast descended unto the
river Kanah, southward of the river—The line which separated
the possessions of the two brothers from each other ran to the south
of the stream. Thus the river was in the territory of Manasseh; but
the cities which were upon the river, though all were within the
limits of Manasseh's possessions, were assigned partly to Ephraim,
and partly to Manasseh; those on the south side being given to the
former; those upon the north to the latter [KEIL].
It appears (Joshua 17:10) that
Manasseh was still further interlaced with other neighboring tribes.
Southward it was Ephraim's, and northward it was Manasseh's, and the sea is his border; and they met together in Asher on the north, and in Issachar on the east.
7-11. the coast of Manasseh was from
Asher to Michmethah—The southern boundary is here traced from
the east. Asher (now Yasir), the starting point, was a town fifteen
Roman miles east of Shechem, and anciently a place of importance.
And Manasseh had in Issachar and in Asher Beth-shean and her towns, and Ibleam and her towns, and the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, and the inhabitants of Endor and her towns, and the inhabitants of Taanach and her towns, and the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns, even three countries.
11. Beth-shean and her towns—Greek,
"Scythopolis" (now Beisan), in the valley of the Jordan,
towards the east end of the plain of Jezreel. "Beth-shean"
means "house of rest," so called from its being the halting
place for caravans travelling between Syria or Midian, and Egypt, and
the great station for the commerce between these countries for many
centuries.
Ibleam and her towns—in
the neighborhood of Megiddo ().
the inhabitants of Dor and
her towns—(now Tantoura), anciently a strong fortress; a wall
of wild precipitous rock defended the shore fortifications against
attack from the land side.
En-dor and her towns—situated
on a rocky eminence, four Roman miles south of Tabor.
Taanach and . . .
Megiddo—These were near to each other, and they are generally
mentioned in Scripture together. They were both royal and strongly
fortified places (see on ).
three countries—districts
or provinces. It is computed that Manasseh possessed in Asher and
Issachar portions of ground to the extent of more than two hundred
square miles.
Joshua 17:12;
Joshua 17:13. CANAANITES
NOT DRIVEN
OUT.
Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities; but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.
12, 13. Yet the children of Manasseh
could not drive out those cities—probably due to indolence, a
love of ease. Perhaps a mistaken humanity, arising from a disregard
or forgetfulness of the divine command, and a decreasing principle of
faith and zeal in the service of God, were the causes of their
failure.
. THE CHILDREN
OF JOSEPH ASK
FOR ANOTHER LOT.
Yet it came to pass, when the children of Israel were waxen strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute; but did not utterly drive them out.
And the children of Joseph spake unto Joshua, saying, Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit, seeing I am a great people, forasmuch as the LORD hath blessed me hitherto?
14-18. the children of Joseph spake
unto Joshua—The two tribes join in laying a complaint before
the leader, as to the narrow boundaries of their allotment and its
insufficiency to be the residence of tribes so vastly increased. But
Joshua's answer was full of wisdom as well as patriotism. Knowing
their character, he treated them accordingly, and sarcastically
turned all their arguments against themselves. Thus he rebuked their
unbelief and cowardice.
And Joshua answered them, If thou be a great people, then get thee up to the wood country, and cut down for thyself there in the land of the Perizzites and of the giants, if mount Ephraim be too narrow for thee.
15. mount Ephraim—called so
here by anticipation. The Gilboa range between Beth-shean and the
plain of Jezreel is meant, anciently covered with an extensive
forest.
And the children of Joseph said, The hill is not enough for us: and all the Canaanites that dwell in the land of the valley have chariots of iron, both they who are of Beth-shean and her towns, and they who are of the valley of Jezreel.
16. chariots of iron—unusually
strengthened with that metal, and perhaps armed with projecting
scythes.
And Joshua spake unto the house of Joseph, even to Ephraim and to Manasseh, saying, Thou art a great people, and hast great power: thou shalt not have one lot only:
14-18. the children of Joseph spake
unto Joshua—The two tribes join in laying a complaint before
the leader, as to the narrow boundaries of their allotment and its
insufficiency to be the residence of tribes so vastly increased. But
Joshua's answer was full of wisdom as well as patriotism. Knowing
their character, he treated them accordingly, and sarcastically
turned all their arguments against themselves. Thus he rebuked their
unbelief and cowardice.
But the mountain shall be thine; for it is a wood, and thou shalt cut it down: and the outgoings of it shall be thine: for thou shalt drive out the Canaanites, though they have iron chariots, and though they be strong.