1.

Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.

2.

For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary.

3.

And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all;

4.

Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

THE SYMBOLISM OF AARON’S ROD
‘Aaron’s rod that budded.’
Hebrews 9:4
We can be at no loss to learn the lesson which the budding of Aaron’s rod is intended to convey to us as Christians. It is that of the supernatural fruitfulness of all God’s ordinances and means of grace. Viewed in themselves they seem mere dead wood, like the rod of Aaron, which was just like those of the rest of the people—mere dead wood without life or sap.
I. The Priesthood of the Church.—Viewed in themselves, Christ’s priests are merely men, as Aaron was. But by God’s appointment they are channels of grace from Christ the Head, and through them He produces fruit for His people which must clearly come from Him, so quickly is it produced. Not even a living tree could have produced blossoms and fruit in a single night, as Aaron’s rod did.
II. The Ministrations of God’s priests.—Received in faith, as God’s ordinances, these ministrations bear fruit with a speed which is clearly God’s doing and not man’s; and the type of Aaron’s rod is fulfilled every day in the history of our churches and our parishes.
III. Our Sacraments.—Viewed in themselves, what is less than the sacramental elements of bread and wine?
( a) What is less than the water of baptism? Yet God has chosen them to be His instruments of grace. Even as He chose Aaron to be His priest, and the Passover to be the seal and sign of His salvation from the Destroying Angel in Egypt.
( b) It is curious to notice, too, horn in the case of the Holy Communion God chose again to carry out the same rule we have observed above, and to take care that the first time it was treated as common bread and common wine the same visible punishment should follow as when His apostles were treated as if they bore no spiritual character. In 1 Corinthians 11:29-30, when St. Paul has to rebuke the Corinthians for profaning the Sacrament, as if it were a mere human institution, he tells them that ‘for this cause many are weak and sickly among you and many sleep’—clearly pointing to some judgment by which God was punishing those who were guilty of this sin, that they might see His displeasure and amend their ways, and having once shown His displeasure, if after that men will not amend He leaves them to bear the consequences. He does not interfere again.

5.

And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercyseat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.

6.

Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God.

7.

But into the second went the high priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself, and for the errors of the people:

8.

The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing:

9.

Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;

10.

Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.

11.

But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building;

12.

Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

13.

For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:

14.

How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

CHRIST’S DEATH AS A SACRIFICE
‘How much more shall the blood of Christ, Who through the Eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?’
Hebrews 9:14
Christ was not dragged to the altar. It was a voluntary sacrifice, it was a spontaneous sacrifice, it was a moral sacrifice, offered by that in Him which was highest through the Eternal Spirit; He ‘offered Himself without spot to God.’
Let me dwell on two results of our Lord’s death.
I. ‘Made sin for us’ ( 2 Corinthians 5:21).—What a mysterious expression that seems to be, and no doubt it is. But surely it becomes to a certain extent intelligible to us from one phase of human experience. Is there not such a thing as intense sympathy, intense solidarity of man with man? How could Christ take our infirmities? how could He bear our sicknesses? The incarnate love and glory of God, the sinless son of God, could not be sick; He took death, which summed up all in itself, but sick with particular sickness He could not be; how then did He take our sickness? It was by the depth of His sympathy that He took it.
II. Christ died that He might emancipate ‘them’—as many as—‘who through fear of death were subject to bondage.’ There are those who through fear of death are so subject through all their life; or rather, through all their living—through every function and part of life. Are there any amongst us who as our lives go on are haunted by that bondage to the fear of death? As one aspect of Christ’s death purges man from sin, so another delivers him from the bondage to the fear of death.
III. Now, think of the effect upon human character.—‘How much more shall the blood of Christ, Who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?’ Observe, the blood of Christ is said there to be the agent. The blood of Christ in the past has too often been looked at merely as a pathetic expression for the suffering and death of Christ. According to the whole symbolism of Scripture the blood is the life thereof. The blood of Christ speaks of His death, but does not rest there; it goes on to the life, the life that was riven from Him—yes, but the life given again; the life that was rendered, yes, but the life tendered to us.
—Archbishop Alexander.
Illustration
‘Dr. Johnson had a perfect horror of death for many years in his life; it was taken away before his time came. No doubt some who are present will remember the sweet and solemn history of the death-bed of Sir Walter Scott, how he died with his windows open to the light, and the soft ripple of the Tweed, as it broke over the pebbles, coming to his ears, and in the chamber itself the voice he loved reading words deeper, truer, grander, fuller than any that had ever dropped even from that magic pen: “In my Father’s house are many mansions.” ’

15.

And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

16.

For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.

17.

For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.

18.

Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood.

19.

For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people,

20.

Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.

21.

Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.

22.

And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

23.

It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

24.

For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

25.

Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others;

26.

For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

THE CROSS
‘Once in the end of the world hath He appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.’
Hebrews 9:26
The greatest danger at the present day among Christians is their becoming so accustomed to the Gospel message that they cease to be keen or enthusiastic about it themselves, with the consequence that they totally fail to interest others in it. There was a good old phrase of another generation which exactly expresses their condition; they are Gospel-hardened.
I. The uniqueness of the Cross.—Notice the uniqueness of the lessons of the Cross, not merely the absolute uniqueness of the event, but its unique surprise. The glamour of the Cross—whether in our cathedrals or churches, or worn on our persons—makes us forget that it was a symbol of ignominy and shame. It was a unique surprise. People are apt to forget that, not merely the Jews practised sacrifice, but that no Roman general would think of going to battle without offering libations to the gods. A few years ago in Northumberland there was found a stone with an altar, an axe, a figure of an ox, and a bowl, and a date of some years before Christ. But within a hundred years Pliny complained to Trajan that no one bought anything for sacrifice. What was the reason? Calvary. The types of sacrifice had been put away by the offering of Christ once at the end of the old dispensation. That unique sacrifice once offered, never to be repeated, but still pleaded by the Church on earth, put an end to the looking forward to the future of which not only the Old Testament prophets but Plato had spoken—‘a good man sure to be killed’ were his words. And now we look backward to the Cross, the only looking forward being to the return of Him Who came to save. The Cross, too, was a unique opportunity for the salvation of the world. Our Lord came in the fulness of time when the world was prepared to receive Him, when the Greek language prepared the way for the missionary, and the Roman roads provided the means of transit. Is the Cross the most magnificent thing in the world to us, as it ought to be if we understand the right proportion of things? How does the death of Christ affect you? How does it touch your lives? Is it a reproach to you? It broke St. Paul’s heart. His self-sufficiency—shared, perhaps, by some in this congregation, who say that they are no worse than their neighbours, and that sin is only undeveloped good—gave way. ‘Thy rebuke hath broken my heart.’ Love is the only thing, not threats, which can secure obedience, as mothers know. Till we realise the meaning of the words, ‘He loved me and gave Himself for me,’ we have not learnt the lesson of the Cross. The easy-going optimism of to-day is refuted by the gaping wounds of the Cross.
II. The absolution of the Cross.—This has been the comfort of thousands in past generations. Lust, temper, and pride depart as on our knees we survey the Cross, but the absolution of the Cross must be preceded by confession, real and complete, before we can feel ourselves
Redeem’d, restored, forgiven,
Through Jesus’ precious blood.
III. The comfort of the Cross.—There are people in almost intolerable pain in sorrow-stricken cities who can only bear it in the power of the Cross. As God has waited and suffered, they feel that they can likewise. No rose-crowned Apollo can bring comfort to the sorrowing. That is only possible through the Cross.
—Bishop A. F. Winnington-Ingram.

27.

And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

THE UNIVERSAL SENTENCE
‘It is appointed unto men once to die.’
Hebrews 9:27
There are no diversities of opinion among men concerning death, for nothing is more obvious and certain. And yet they think very little comparatively about it.
But what is death? It is the cessation of material being. First, there is coldness, then stillness, then decay.
I. The changes wrought by death.
(a) It closes the probation of man.
(b) It sunders the union of body and soul.
(c) It imposes a change of residence.
II. The appointment of death.
(a) It is Divine. God Himself determined it at the first; and it is according to His original threatening ( Genesis 2:16-17). Man partook of the forbidden fruit, and instantly began to die, and now man,
The very moment of his breath,
Receives the lurking principle of death;
The young disease, that must subdue at length,
Grows with his growth, and strengthens with his strength.
But God, notwithstanding, carries out His own appointment. He gives life, and he takes it away ( Job 1:21).
(b) It is punitive. If man had not broken the primal mandate, God would have continued his life in Eden, or ultimately raised him to a higher and still more blissful Paradise.
Illustration
‘Whatever we can only do “once,” necessarily carries with it a greatness and an awe—if it be only for this, that if we do it badly, we can never do it again. This is one reason of the solemnity of death. If you fail in it, you will never have an opportunity of repeating it, that you may do it better. And we ought—if God permit us our senses—we ought to die well—peacefully, usefully—to the glory of God. “May I die the death of the righteous!” was a prayer true to every instinct of our minds.’

28.

So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.