In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
1. In the beginning—of all
time and created existence, for this Word gave it being (John 1:3;
John 1:10); therefore, "before
the world was" (John 17:5;
John 17:24); or, from all
eternity.
was the Word—He who
is to God what man's word is to himself, the manifestation or
expression of himself to those without him. (See on John 17:24). On the origin of this most lofty and now for ever
consecrated title of Christ, this is not the place to speak. It
occurs only in the writings of this seraphic apostle.
was with God—having a
conscious personal existence distinct from God (as one is from
the person he is "with"), but inseparable from Him
and associated with Him (John 1:18;
John 17:5; 1 John 1:2),
where "THE FATHER"
is used in the same sense as "GOD"
here.
was God—in substance
and essence GOD; or was
possessed of essential or proper divinity. Thus, each of these brief
but pregnant statements is the complement of the other, correcting
any misapprehensions which the others might occasion. Was the Word
eternal? It was not the eternity of "the
Father," but of a conscious personal existence distinct
from Him and associated with Him. Was the Word thus "with
God?" It was not the distinctness and the fellowship of another
being, as if there were more Gods than one, but of One who
was Himself God—in such sense that the absolute unity
of the God head, the great principle of all religion, is only
transferred from the region of shadowy abstraction to the region of
essential life and love. But why all this definition? Not to give us
any abstract information about certain mysterious distinctions
in the Godhead, but solely to let the reader know who it was that
in the fulness of time "was made flesh." After each
verse, then, the reader must say, "It was He who is thus, and
thus, and thus described, who was made flesh."
The same was in the beginning with God.
2. The same, &c.—See what
property of the Word the stress is laid upon—His eternal
distinctness, in unity, from God—the Father ().
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
3. All things, c.—all things
absolutely (as is evident from John 1:10
1 Corinthians 8:6; Colossians 1:16;
Colossians 1:17; but put beyond question
by what follows).
without Him was not any
thing—not one thing.
made—brought into
being.
that was made—This is a
denial of the eternity and non-creation of matter,
which was held by the whole thinking world outside of Judaism and
Christianity: or rather, its proper creation was never so
much as dreamt of save by the children of revealed religion.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
4. In Him was life—essentially
and originally, as the previous verses show to be the meaning.
Thus He is the Living Word, or, as He is called in 1 John 1:1;
1 John 1:2, "the Word of Life."
the life . . . the light of
men—All that in men which is true light—knowledge,
integrity, intelligent, willing subjection to God, love to Him and to
their fellow creatures, wisdom, purity, holy joy, rational
happiness—all this "light of men" has its fountain in the
essential original "life" of "the Word" (1 John 1:5-7;
Psalms 36:9).
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
5. shineth in darkness, &c.—in
this dark, fallen world, or in mankind "sitting in darkness and
the shadow of death," with no ability to find the way either
of truth or of holiness. In this thick darkness, and consequent
intellectual and moral obliquity, "the light of the Word"
shineth—by all the rays whether of natural or revealed teaching
which men (apart from the Incarnation of the Word) are favored
with.
the darkness comprehended it
not—did not take it in, a brief summary of the effect of
all the strivings of this unincarnate Word throughout this
wide world from the beginning, and a hint of the necessity of His
putting on flesh, if any recovery of men was to be effected
(1 Corinthians 1:21).
There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
6-9. The Evangelist here
approaches his grand thesis, so paving his way for the full
statement of it in John 1:14,
that we may be able to bear the bright light of it, and take in its
length and breadth and depth and height.
The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
7. through him—John.
He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
8. not that Light—(See on ). What a testimony to John to have to explain that "he
was not that Light!" Yet was he but a foil to set it off,
his night-taper dwindling before the Dayspring from on high ().
That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
9. lighteth every man,
c.—rather, "which, coming into the world, enlighteneth every
man" or, is "the Light of the world" (). "Coming into the world" is a superfluous and
quite unusual description of "every man"; but it is of all
descriptions of Christ amongst the most familiar, especially in the
writings of this Evangelist (John 12:46;
John 16:28; John 18:37;
1 John 4:9; 1 Timothy 1:15,
&c.).
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
10-13. He was in the world,
c.—The language here is nearly as wonderful as the thought. Observe
its compact simplicity, its sonorousness—"the world"
resounding in each of its three members—and the enigmatic form in
which it is couched, startling the reader and setting his ingenuity
a-working to solve the stupendous enigma of Christ ignored in His
own world. "The world," in the first two clauses,
plainly means the created world, into which He
came, says John 1:9 "in
it He was," says this verse. By His Incarnation, He became an
inhabitant of it, and bound up with it. Yet it "was made by
Him" (John 1:3-5).
Here, then, it is merely alluded to, in contrast partly with His
being in it, but still more with the reception He met with
from it. "The world that knew Him not" (John 1:3-43) is of course the intelligent world of mankind. (See on John 1:3-43). Taking the first two clauses as one statement, we try
to apprehend it by thinking of the infant Christ conceived in the
womb and born in the arms of His own creature, and of the Man Christ
Jesus breathing His own air, treading His own ground, supported by
substances to which He Himself gave being, and the Creator of the
very men whom He came to save. But the most vivid commentary on this
entire verse will be got by tracing (in His matchless history) Him of
whom it speaks walking amidst all the elements of nature, the
diseases of men and death itself, the secrets of the human heart, and
"the rulers of the darkness of this world" in all their
number, subtlety, and malignity, not only with absolute ease, as
their conscious Lord, but, as we might say, with full consciousness
on their part of the presence of their Maker, whose will to one and
all of them was law. And this is He of whom it is added, "the
world knew Him not!"
He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
11. his own—"His own"
(property or possession), for the word is in the neuter
gender. It means His own land, city, temple, Messianic rights and
possessions.
and his own—"His
own (people)"; for now the word is masculine. It means
the Jews, as the "peculiar people." Both they and
their land, with all that this included, were "HIS
OWN," not so much as part of "the world which was
made by Him," but as "THE
HEIR" of the inheritance (; see also on Matthew 22:1).
received him not—nationally,
as God's chosen witnesses.
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
12. But as many—individuals,
of the "disobedient and gainsaying people."
gave he power—The word
signifies both authority and ability, and both are
certainly meant here.
to become—Mark these
words: Jesus is the Son of God; He is never said to have become such.
the sons—or more
simply, "sons of God," in name and in nature.
believe on his name—a
phrase never used in Scripture of any mere creature, to express
the credit given to human testimony, even of prophets or apostles,
inasmuch it carries with it the idea of trust proper only
towards GOD. In this sense
of supreme faith, as due to Him who "gives those that
believe in Himself power to become sons of God," it is
manifestly used here.
Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
13. Which were born—a sonship
therefore not of mere title and privilege, but of nature, the
soul being made conscious of the vital capacities, perceptions, and
emotions of a child of God, before unknown.
not of blood, &c.—not
of superior human descent, not of human generation at all, not of man
in any manner of way. By this elaborate threefold denial of the human
source of this sonship, immense force is given to what follows,
but of God—Right royal
gift, and He who confers must be absolutely divine. For who would not
worship Him who can bring him into the family, and evoke within him
the very life, of the sons of God?
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
14. And the Word, c.—To
raise the reader to the altitude of this climax were the thirteen
foregoing verses written.
was made flesh—BECAME
MAN, in man's present frail, mortal condition, denoted by the
word "flesh" (Isaiah 40:6
1 Peter 1:24). It is directed
probably against the Docetæ, who held that Christ was not
really but only apparently man; against whom this gentle
spirit is vehement in his Epistles (1 John 4:3;
2 John 1:7; 2 John 1:10;
2 John 1:11), [LUCKE,
c.]. Nor could He be too much so, for with the verity of the
Incarnation all substantial Christianity vanishes. But now, married
to our nature, henceforth He is as personally conscious of all
that is strictly human as of all that is properly divine and our
nature is in His Person redeemed and quickened, ennobled and
transfigured.
and dwelt—tabernacled
or pitched his tent; a word peculiar to John, who uses it four times,
all in the sense of a permanent stay (Revelation 7:15;
Revelation 12:12; Revelation 13:6;
Revelation 21:3). For ever wedded to our
"flesh," He has entered this tabernacle to "go
no more out." The allusion is to that tabernacle where dwelt the
Shekinah (see on Revelation 21:3),
or manifested "GLORY OF THE
LORD," and with
reference to God's permanent dwelling among His people
(Leviticus 26:11; Psalms 68:18;
Psalms 132:13; Psalms 132:14;
Ezekiel 37:27). This is put almost
beyond doubt by what immediately follows, "And we beheld his
glory" [LUCKE, MEYER,
DE WETTE
which last critic, rising higher than usual, says that thus were
perfected all former partial manifestations of God in an
essentially Personal and historically Human manifestation].
full of grace and truth—So
it should read: "He dwelt among us full of grace and truth";
or, in Old Testament phrase, "Mercy and truth," denoting
the whole fruit of God's purposes of love towards sinners of mankind,
which until now existed only in promise, and the fulfilment
at length of that promise in Christ; in one great word, "the
SURE MERCIES of David"
(Isaiah 55:3; Acts 13:34;
compare 2 Samuel 23:5). In His
Person all that Grace and Truth which had been floating so long in
shadowy forms, and darting into the souls of the poor and needy its
broken beams, took everlasting possession of human flesh and filled
it full. By this Incarnation of Grace and Truth, the teaching of
thousands of years was at once transcended and beggared, and the
family of God sprang into Manhood.
and we beheld his glory—not
by the eye of sense, which saw in Him only "the
carpenter." His glory was "spiritually discerned"
(1 Corinthians 2:7-15; 2 Corinthians 3:18;
2 Corinthians 4:4; 2 Corinthians 4:6;
2 Corinthians 5:16) —the glory of
surpassing grace, love, tenderness, wisdom, purity, spirituality;
majesty and meekness, richness and poverty, power and weakness,
meeting together in unique contrast; ever attracting and at times
ravishing the "babes" that followed and forsook all for
Him.
the glory as of the only
begotten of the Father—(See on 2 Corinthians 5:16); not like, but "such as (belongs to),"
such as became or was befitting the only begotten of
the Father [CHRYSOSTOM in
LUCKE, CALVIN,
&c.], according to a well-known use of the word "as."
2 Corinthians 5:16. A SAYING OF THE
BAPTIST CONFIRMATORY
OF THIS.
John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.
15. after me—in official
manifestation.
before me—in rank
and dignity.
for he was before me—in
existence; "His goings forth being from of old, from
everlasting" (Micah 5:2).
(Anything lower than this His words cannot mean); that is, "My
Successor is my Superior, for He was my Predecessor." This
enigmatic play upon the different senses of the words "before"
and "after" was doubtless employed by the Baptist to arrest
attention, and rivet the thought; and the Evangelist introduces it
just to clinch his own statements.
Micah 5:2. SAME SUBJECT
CONTINUED.
And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.
16. of his fulness—of "grace
and truth," resuming the thread of .
grace for grace—that
is, grace upon grace (so all the best interpreters), in successive
communications and larger measures, as each was able to take it in.
Observe, the word "truth" is here dropped. "Grace"
being the chosen New Testament word for the whole fulness of the new
covenant, all that dwells in Christ for men.
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
17. For, c.—The Law elicits
the consciousness of sin and the need of redemption it only typifies
the reality. The Gospel, on the contrary, actually communicates
reality and power from above (compare ). Hence Paul terms the Old Testament "shadow,"
while he calls the New Testament "substance" () [OLSHAUSEN].
No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
18. No man—"No one,"
in the widest sense.
hath seen God—by
immediate gaze, or direct intuition.
in the bosom of the Father—A
remarkable expression, used only here, presupposing the Son's
conscious existence distinct from the Father, and expressing His
immediate and most endeared access to, and absolute
acquaintance with, Him.
he—emphatic; As if he
should say, "He and He only hath declared Him," because He
only can.
. THE BAPTIST'S
TESTIMONY TO CHRIST.
And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?
19. record—testimony.
the Jews—that is, the
heads of the nation, the members of the Sanhedrim. In this
peculiar sense our Evangelist seems always to use the term.
And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.
20. confessed, &c.—that
is, While many were ready to hail him as the Christ, he neither gave
the slightest ground for such views, nor the least entertainment to
them.
And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.
21. Elias—in His own proper
person.
that prophet—announced
in Deuteronomy 18:15, &c., about
whom they seem not to have been agreed whether he were the same with
the Messiah or no.
Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?
He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.
And they which were sent were of the Pharisees.
And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet?
25. Why baptizest thou, if not,
&c.—Thinking he disclaimed any special connection with
Messiah's kingdom, they demand his right to gather disciples by
baptism.
John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;
26. there standeth—This must
have been spoken after the baptism of Christ, and possibly just after
His temptation (see on John 1:29).
He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.
These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.
28. Bethabara—Rather,
"Bethany" (according to nearly all the best and most
ancient manuscripts); not the Bethany of Lazarus, but another of the
same name, and distinguished from it as lying "beyond Jordan,"
on the east.
The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
29. seeth Jesus—fresh,
probably, from the scene of the temptation.
coming unto him—as to
congenial company (Acts 4:23),
and to receive from him His first greeting.
and saith—catching a
sublime inspiration at the sight of Him approaching.
the Lamb of God—the one
God-ordained, God-gifted sacrificial offering.
that taketh away—taketh
up and taketh away. The word signifies both, as does the
corresponding Hebrew word. Applied to sin, it means to be
chargeable with the guilt of it (Exodus 28:38;
Leviticus 5:1; Ezekiel 18:20),
and to bear it away (as often). In the Levitical victims both
ideas met, as they do in Christ, the people's guilt being viewed as
transferred to them, avenged in their death, and so
borne away by them (Leviticus 4:15;
Leviticus 16:15; Leviticus 16:21;
Leviticus 16:22; and compare Isaiah 53:6-12;
2 Corinthians 5:21).
the sin—The singular
number being used to mark the collective burden and
all-embracing efficacy.
of the world—not of
Israel only, for whom the typical victims were exclusively offered.
Wherever there shall live a sinner throughout the wide world, sinking
under that burden too heavy for him to bear, he shall find in this
"Lamb of God," a shoulder equal to the weight. The right
note was struck at the first—balm, doubtless, to Christ's own
spirit; nor was ever after, or ever will be, a more glorious
utterance.
This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me.
And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.
31-34. knew him not—Living
mostly apart, the one at Nazareth, the other in the Judean desert—to
prevent all appearance of collusion, John only knew that at a
definite time after his own call, his Master would show Himself. As
He drew near for baptism one day, the last of all the crowd, the
spirit of the Baptist heaving under a divine presentiment that the
moment had at length arrived, and an air of unwonted serenity and
dignity, not without traits, probably, of the family features,
appearing in this Stranger, the Spirit said to him as to Samuel of
his youthful type, "Arise, anoint Him, for this is He!"
(1 Samuel 16:12). But the
sign which he was told to expect was the visible descent of the
Spirit upon Him as He emerged out of the baptismal water. Then,
catching up the voice from heaven, "he saw and bare record that
this is the Son of God."
And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.
And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.
And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.
Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples;
35. John stood—"was
standing," at his accustomed place.
And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God!
36. looking—having fixed his
eyes, with significant gaze, on Jesus.
as he walked—but not
now to him. To have done this once (see on ) was humility enough [BENGEL].
Behold, &c.—The
repetition of that wonderful proclamation, in identical terms and
without another word, could only have been meant as a gentle hint to
go after Him—as they did.
. FIRST
GATHERING OF
DISCIPLES—JOHN
ANDREW, SIMON,
PHILIP, NATHANAEL.
And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.
Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou?
38. What seek ye—gentle,
winning question, remarkable as the Redeemer's first public
utterance. (See on .)
where dwellest thou—that
is, "That is a question we cannot answer in a moment; but had we
Thy company for a calm hour in private, gladly should we open our
burden."
He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour.
39. Come and see—His second
utterance, more winning still.
tenth hour—not ten A.M.
(as some), according to Roman, but four P.M.,
according to Jewish reckoning, which John follows. The hour is
mentioned to show why they stayed out the day with him—because
little of it remained.
One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother.
40. One . . . was Andrew—The
other was doubtless our Evangelist himself. His great sensitiveness
is touchingly shown in his representation of this first contact with
the Lord; the circumstances are present to him in the minutest
details; he still remembers the Very hour. But "he reports no
particulars of those discourses of the Lord by which he was bound to
Him for the whole of His life; he allows everything personal to
retire" [OLSHAUSEN].
Peter's brother—and the
elder of the two.
He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.
41. have found the Messias—The
previous preparation of their simple hearts under the Baptist's
ministry, made quick work of this blessed conviction, while others
hesitated till doubt settled into obduracy. So it is still.
And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.
42. brought him to Jesus—Happy
brothers that thus do to each other!
beheld him—fixed his
eyes on him, with significant gaze (as ).
Cephas . . . stone—(See
on ).
The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me.
43. would go . . . into Galilee—for
from His baptism He had sojourned in Judea (showing that the
calling at the Sea of Galilee [] was a subsequent one, see on ).
Follow me—the first
express call given, the former three having come to Him
spontaneously.
Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.
44. the city of Andrew and Peter—of
their birth probably, for they seem to have lived at
Capernaum (Mark 1:29).
Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.
45. Nathanael—(See on ).
Moses—(See ).
son of Joseph—the
current way of speaking. (See ).
And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.
46. any good out of
Nazareth—remembering Bethlehem, perhaps, as Messiah's predicted
birthplace, and Nazareth having no express prophetic place at
all, besides being in no repute. The question sprang from mere dread
of mistake in a matter so vital.
Come and see—Noble
remedy against preconceived opinions [BENGEL].
Philip, though he could not perhaps solve his difficulty, could show
him how to get rid of it. (See on ).
Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!
47. an Israelite indeed . . . no
guile—not only no hypocrite, but with a guileless simplicity
not always found even in God's own people, ready to follow wherever
truth might lead him, saying, Samuel-like, "Speak, Lord, for Thy
servant heareth" (1 Samuel 3:10).
Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.
48. Whence knowest thou me—conscious
that his very heart had been read, and at this critical moment more
than ever before.
Before Philip called
thee—showing He knew all that passed between Philip and him at
a distance.
when . . . under the fig
tree, &c.—where retirement for meditation and prayer was
not uncommon [LIGHTFOOT].
Thither, probably—hearing that his master's Master had at length
appeared, and heaving with mingled eagerness to behold Him and dread
of deception—he had retired to pour out his guileless heart for
light and guidance, ending with such a prayer as this, "Show me
a token for good!" (See on ).
Now he has it, "Thou guileless one, that fig tree scene, with
all its heaving anxieties, deep pleadings and tremulous hopes—I saw
it all." The first words of Jesus had astonished, but this quite
overpowered and won him.
Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.
49. Son of God . . . King of
Israel—the one denoting His person, the other His office. How
much loftier this than anything Philip had said to him! But just as
the earth's vital powers, the longer they are frost-bound, take the
greater spring when at length set free, so souls, like Nathanael and
Thomas (see on John 1:2), the
outgoings of whose faith are hindered for a time, take the start of
their more easy-going brethren when loosed and let go.
Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.
50, 51. Because I said, &c.—"So
quickly convinced, and on this evidence only?"—an expression
of admiration.
And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.
51. Hereafter, &c.—The key
to this great saying is Jacob's vision (), to which the allusion plainly is. To show the
patriarch that though alone and friendless on earth his interests
were busying all heaven, he was made to see "heaven opened and
the angels of God ascending and descending upon a" mystic
"ladder reaching from heaven to earth." "By and
by," says Jesus here, "ye shall see this communication
between heaven and earth thrown wide open, and the Son of man the
real Ladder of this intercourse."