Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.
Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth.
1. Though to those knowing that
an idol has no existence, the question of eating meats offered to
idols (referred to in the letter of the Corinthians, compare ) might seem unimportant, it is not so with some, and the
infirmities of such should be respected. The portions of the victims
not offered on the altars belonged partly to the priests, partly to
the offerers; and were eaten at feasts in the temples and in private
houses and were often sold in the markets; so that Christians were
constantly exposed to the temptation of receiving them, which was
forbidden (Numbers 25:2; Psalms 106:28).
The apostles forbade it in their decree issued from Jerusalem
(Acts 15:1-29; Acts 21:25);
but Paul does not allude here to that decree, as he rests his
precepts rather on his own independent apostolic authority.
we know that we all have
knowledge—The Corinthians doubtless had referred to their
"knowledge" (namely, of the indifference of meats, as in
themselves having no sanctity or pollution). Paul replies, "We
are aware that we all have [speaking generally, and so far as
Christian theory goes; for in Acts 21:25 he speaks of some who practically have not]
this knowledge."
Knowledge puffeth up—when
without "love." Here a parenthesis begins; and the main
subject is resumed in the same words, Acts 21:25. "As concerning [touching] therefore the eating,"
c. "Puffing up" is to please self. "Edifying" is
to please one's neighbor Knowledge only says, All things are lawful
for me; Love adds, But all things do not edify [BENGEL],
(1 Corinthians 10:23; Romans 14:15).
edifieth—tends to build
up the spiritual temple (1 Corinthians 3:9;
1 Corinthians 6:19).
And if any man think that he knoweth anything, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.
2. And—omitted in the oldest
manuscripts The absence of the connecting particle gives an
emphatical sententiousness to the style, suitable to the subject. The
first step to knowledge is to know our own ignorance. Without love
there is only the appearance of knowledge.
knoweth—The oldest
manuscripts read a Greek word implying personal
experimental acquaintance, not merely knowledge of a fact,
which the Greek of "we know" or are aware
(1 Corinthians 8:1) means.
as he ought to
know—experimentally and in the way of "love."
But if any man love God, the same is known of him.
3. love God—the source of love
to our neighbor (1 John 4:11;
1 John 4:12; 1 John 4:20;
1 John 5:2).
the same—literally,
"this man"; he who loves, not he who "thinks that he
knows," not having "charity" or love (1 Corinthians 8:1;
1 Corinthians 8:2).
is known of him—is
known with the knowledge of approval and is acknowledged by God as
His (Psalms 1:6; Galatians 4:9;
2 Timothy 2:19). Contrast, "I
never knew you" (Matthew 7:23).
To love God is to know God; and he who thus knows God has been first
known by God (compare 1 Corinthians 13:12;
1 Peter 1:2).
As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one.
4. As concerning, c.—resuming
the subject begun in 1 Corinthians 8:1,
"As touching," &c.
idol is nothing—has no
true being at all, the god it represents is not a living reality.
This does not contradict 1 Corinthians 8:1, which states that they who worship idols, worship devils
for here it is the GODS
believed by the worshippers to be represented by the idols
which are denied to have any existence, not the devils which really
under the idols delude the worshippers.
none other God—The
oldest manuscripts omit the word "other"; which gives a
clearer sense.
For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)
5. "For even supposing
there are (exist) gods so called (), whether in heaven (as the sun, moon, and stars) or in earth
(as deified kings, beasts, c.), as there be (a recognized fact,
Deuteronomy 10:17 Psalms 135:5;
Psalms 136:2) gods many and lords
many." Angels and men in authority are termed gods in
Scripture, as exercising a divinely delegated power under God
(compare Exodus 22:9; Exodus 22:28;
Psalms 82:1; Psalms 82:6;
John 10:34; John 10:35).
But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
6. to us—believers.
of whom—from whom as
Creator all things derive their existence.
we in him—rather, "we
for Him," or "unto Him." God the FATHER
is the end for whom and for whose glory believers live. In all things are said to be created (not only "by"
Christ, but also) "for Him" (CHRIST).
So entirely are the Father and Son one (compare Romans 11:36;
Hebrews 2:10).
one Lord—contrasted
with the "many lords" of heathendom (Hebrews 2:10).
by whom— (John 1:3;
Hebrews 1:2).
we by him—as all things
are "of" the Father by creation, so they (we
believers especially) are restored to Him by the new creation
(Colossians 1:20; Revelation 21:5).
Also, as all things are by Christ by creation, so they (we
especially) are restored by Him by the new creation.
Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.
7. Howbeit—Though to us who
"have knowledge" (1 Corinthians 8:1;
1 Corinthians 8:4-6) all meats are
indifferent, yet "this knowledge is not in all" in the same
degree as we have it. Paul had admitted to the Corinthians that "we
all have knowledge" (1 Corinthians 8:1),
that is, so far as Christian theory goes; but practically
some have it not in the same degree.
with conscience—an
ancient reading; but other very old manuscripts read "association"
or "habit." In either reading the meaning is: Some Gentile
Christians, whether from old association of ideas or
misdirected conscience, when they ate such meats, ate them
with some feeling as if the idol were something real (1 Corinthians 8:1), and had changed the meats by the fact of the consecration
into something either holy or else polluted.
unto this hour—after
they have embraced Christianity; an implied censure, that they are
not further advanced by this time in Christian "knowledge."
their conscience . . . is
defiled—by their eating it "as a thing offered to idols."
If they ate it unconscious at the time that it had been offered to
idols, there would be no defilement of conscience. But conscious of
what it was, and not having such knowledge as other Corinthians
boasted of, namely, that an idol is nothing and can therefore neither
pollute nor sanctify meats, they by eating them sin against
conscience (compare 1 Corinthians 8:1). It was on the ground of Christian expediency, not to
cause a stumbling-block to "weak" brethren, that the
Jerusalem decree against partaking of such meats (though indifferent
in themselves) was passed (1 Corinthians 8:1). Hence he here vindicates it against the Corinthian
asserters of an inexpedient liberty.
But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse.
8. Other old manuscripts read,
"Neither if we do not eat, are we the better: neither if we eat
are we the worse": the language of the eaters who justified
their eating thus [LACHMANN].
In English Version Paul admits that "meat neither
presents [so the Greek for 'commendeth'] us as
commended nor as disapproved before God": it does not affect our
standing before God (Romans 14:6).
But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.
9. this liberty of yours—the
watchword for lax Corinthians. The very indifference of meats, which
I concede, is the reason why ye should "take heed" not to
tempt weak brethren to act against their conscience (which
constitutes sin, Romans 14:22;
Romans 14:23).
For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;
10. if any man—being weak.
which hast knowledge—The
very knowledge which thou pridest thyself on (), will lead the weak after thy example to do that against his
conscience, which thou doest without any scruple of conscience;
namely, to eat meats offered to idols.
conscience of him which is
weak—rather, "His conscience, seeing he is weak"
[ALFORD and others].
emboldened—literally,
"built up." You ought to have built up your brother
in good: but by your example your building him up is
the emboldening him to violate his conscience.
And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?
11. shall . . . perish—The
oldest manuscripts read "perisheth." A single act seemingly
unimportant may produce everlasting consequences. The weak brother
loses his faith, and if he do not recover it, his salvation [BENGEL]
(Romans 14:23).
for whom Christ died—and
for whose sake we too ought to be willing to die (Romans 14:23). And yet professing Christians at Corinth virtually tempted
their brethren to their damnation, so far were they from sacrificing
aught for their salvation. Note here, that it is no argument against
the dogma that Christ died for all, even for those who perish,
to say that thus He would have died in vain for many.
Scripture is our rule, not our suppositions as to consequences. More
is involved in redemption than the salvation of man: the character
of God as at once just and loving is vindicated even in the case
of the lost for they might have been saved, and so even in their case
Christ has not died in vain. So the mercies of God's providence are
not in vain, though many abuse them. Even the condemned shall
manifest God's love in the great day, in that they too had the offer
of God's mercy. It shall be the most awful ingredient in their cup
that they might have been saved but would not: Christ died to redeem
even them.
But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ.
12. wound their weak
conscience—literally, "smite their conscience,
being (as yet) in a weak state." It aggravates the
cruelty of the act that it is committed on the weak, just as if one
were to strike an invalid.
against Christ—on
account of the sympathy between Christ and His members (Matthew 25:40;
Acts 9:4; Acts 9:5).
Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.
13. meat—Old English
for "food" in general.
make . . . to offend—Greek,
"is a stumbling-block to."
no flesh—In order to
ensure my avoiding flesh offered to idols, I would abstain from all
kinds of flesh, in order not to be a stumbling-block to my
brother.