Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all;
Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all;
1-7. The fact of God's sending
His Son to redeem us who were under the law (), and sending the Spirit of His Son into our hearts (), confirms the conclusion () that we are "heirs according to the promise."
the heir— (). It is not, as in earthly inheritances, the death of the
father, but our Father's sovereign will simply that makes us heirs.
child—Greek,
"one under age."
differeth nothing,
c.—that is, has no more freedom than a slave (so the Greek
for "servant" means). He is not at his own disposal.
lord of all—by title
and virtual ownership (compare 1 Corinthians 3:21
1 Corinthians 3:22).
But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed of the father.
2. tutors and governors—rather,
"guardians (of the person) and stewards (of the property)."
Answering to "the law was our schoolmaster" or "tutor"
(Galatians 3:24).
until the time appointed of
the father—in His eternal purposes (Galatians 3:24). The Greek is a legal term, expressing a time
defined by law, or testamentary disposition.
Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world:
3. we—the Jews primarily, and
inclusively the Gentiles also. For the "we" in plainly refers to both Jew and Gentile believers. The
Jews in their bondage to the law of Moses, as the representative
people of the world, include all mankind virtually amenable to God's
law (Romans 2:14; Romans 2:15;
compare Note, see on Romans 2:15; Galatians 3:23). Even the
Gentiles were under "bondage," and in a state of discipline
suitable to nonage, till Christ came as the Emancipator.
were in bondage—as
"servants" (Galatians 4:1).
under the elements—or
"rudiments"; rudimentary religion teaching of a
non-Christian character: the elementary lessons of outward things
(literally, "of the [outward] world"); such as the legal
ordinances mentioned, Galatians 4:10
(Colossians 2:8; Colossians 2:20).
Our childhood's lessons [CONYBEARE
and HOWSON]. Literally,
The letters of the alphabet (Colossians 2:20).
But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
4. the fulness of the time—namely,
"the time appointed by the Father" (). Compare Note, see on ; Luke 1:57; Acts 2:1;
Ezekiel 5:2. "The Church has its
own ages" [BENGEL].
God does nothing prematurely, but, foreseeing the end from the
beginning, waits till all is ripe for the execution of His purpose.
Had Christ come directly after the fall, the enormity and deadly
fruits of sin would not have been realized fully by man, so as to
feel his desperate state and need of a Saviour. Sin was fully
developed. Man's inability to save himself by obedience to the law,
whether that of Moses, or that of conscience, was completely
manifested; all the prophecies of various ages found their common
center in this particular time: and Providence, by various
arrangements in the social and political, as well as the moral world,
had fully prepared the way for the coming Redeemer. God often permits
physical evil long before he teaches the remedy. The smallpox had for
long committed its ravages before inoculation, and then vaccination,
was discovered. It was essential to the honor of God's law to permit
evil long before He revealed the full remedy. Compare "the set
time" (Psalms 102:13).
was come—Greek,
"came."
sent forth—Greek,
"sent forth out of heaven from Himself"
[ALFORD and BENGEL].
The same verb is used of the Father's sending forth the Spirit (Psalms 102:13). So in Acts 7:12.
Compare with this verse, John 8:42;
Isaiah 48:16.
his—emphatical. "His
own Son." Not by adoption, as we are (Isaiah 48:16): nor merely His Son by the anointing of the Spirit which God
sends into the heart (Galatians 4:6;
John 1:18).
made of a woman—"made"
is used as in 1 Corinthians 15:45, "The
first man, Adam, was made a living soul," Greek,
"made to be (born) of a woman." The expression
implies a special interposition of God in His birth as man, namely,
causing Him to be conceived by the Holy Ghost. So ESTIUS.
made under the law—"made
to be under the law." Not merely as GROTIUS
and ALFORD explain, "Born
subject to the law as a Jew." But "made" by His
Father's appointment, and His own free will, "subject to the
law," to keep it all, ceremonial and moral, perfectly for us, as
the Representative Man, and to suffer and exhaust the full penalty of
our whole race's violation of it. This constitutes the significance
of His circumcision, His being presented in the temple (Luke 2:21;
Luke 2:22; Luke 2:27;
compare Matthew 5:17), and His
baptism by John, when He said (Matthew 5:17), "Thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness."
To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.
5. To—Greek, "That
He might redeem."
them . . . under the
law—primarily the Jews: but as these were the representative
people of the world, the Gentiles, too, are included in the
redemption (Galatians 3:13).
receive—The Greek
implies the suitableness of the thing as long ago predestined
by God. "Receive as something destined or due" (Luke 23:41;
2 John 1:8). Herein God makes of
sons of men sons of God, inasmuch as God made of the Son of God the
Son of man [AUGUSTINE on
Psalm 52].
And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
6. because ye are sons—The
gift of the Spirit of prayer is the consequence of our adoption. The
Gentile Galatians might think, as the Jews were under the law before
their adoption, that so they, too, must first be under the law. Paul,
by anticipation, meets this objection by saying, YE
ARE sons, therefore ye need not be as children () under the tutorship of the law, as being already in the free
state of "sons" of God by faith in Christ (), no longer in your nonage (as "children," ). The Spirit of God's only Begotten Son in your hearts, sent
from, and leading you to cry to, the Father, attests your sonship by
adoption: for the Spirit is the "earnest of your inheritance"
(Romans 8:15; Romans 8:16;
Ephesians 1:13). "It is because ye
are sons that God sent forth" (the Greek requires this
translation, not "hath sent forth") into OUR
(so the oldest manuscripts read for "your," in English
Version) hearts the Spirit of His son, crying, "Abba,
Father" (John 1:12). As in
Galatians 4:5 he changed from "them,"
the third person, to "we," the first person, so here he
changes from "ye," the second person, to "our,"
the first person: this he does to identify their case as Gentiles,
with his own and that of his believing fellow countrymen, as Jews. In
another point of view, though not the immediate one intended by the
context, this verse expresses, "Because ye are sons
(already in God's electing purpose of love), God sent forth the
Spirit of His Son into your hearts," c.: God thus, by sending
His Spirit in due time, actually conferring that sonship which He
already regarded as a present reality ("are") because of
His purpose, even before it was actually fulfilled. So Galatians 4:5, where "the children" are spoken of as existing in
His purpose, before their actual existence.
the Spirit of his Son—By
faith ye are one with the Son, so that what is His is yours His
Sonship ensures your sonship; His Spirit ensures for you a share in
the same. "If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none
of His" (Romans 8:9). Moreover,
as the Spirit of God proceeds from God the Father, so the Spirit of
the Son proceeds from the Son: so that the Holy Ghost, as the Creed
says, "proceedeth from the Father and the Son." The Father
was not begotten: the Son is begotten of the Father;
the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son.
crying—Here the SPIRIT
is regarded as the agent in praying, and the believer as His
organ. In Romans 8:15, "The
Spirit of adoption" is said to be that whereby WE
cry, "Abba, Father"; but in Romans 8:15, "The SPIRIT ITSELF
maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered."
The believers' prayer is His prayer: hence arises its acceptability
with God.
Abba, Father—The Hebrew
says, "Abba" (a Hebrew term), the Greek,
"Father" ("Pater," a Greek term in
the original), both united together in one Sonship and one cry of
faith, "Abba, Father." So "Even so ('Nai,'
Greek) Amen (Hebrew)," both meaning the same (Romans 8:15). Christ's own former cry is the believers' cry, "Abba,
Father" (Mark 14:36).
Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.
7. Wherefore—Conclusion
inferred from Galatians 4:4-6.
thou—individualizing
and applying the truth to each. Such an individual appropriation of
this comforting truth God grants in answer to them who cry, "Abba,
Father."
heir of God through
Christ—The oldest manuscripts read, "an heir through God."
This combines on behalf of man, the whole before-mentioned agency, of
THE TRINITY:
the Father sent His Son and the Spirit; the Son has freed us from the
law; the Spirit has completed our sonship. Thus the redeemed are
heirs THROUGH the Triune
GOD, not through the law,
nor through fleshly descent [WINDISCHMANN
in ALFORD]; (Galatians 4:4-48 confirms this).
heir—confirming Galatians 4:4-48; compare Romans 8:17.
Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.
8-11. Appeal to them not to turn
back from their privileges as free sons, to legal bondage again.
then—when ye were
"servants" (Galatians 4:7).
ye knew not God—not
opposed to Romans 1:21. The heathen
originally knew God, as Romans 1:21 states, but did not choose to retain God in their knowledge,
and so corrupted the original truth. They might still have
known Him, in a measure, from His works, but as a matter of fact they
knew Him not, so far as His eternity, His power as the Creator, and
His holiness, are concerned.
are no gods—that is,
have no existence, such as their worshippers attribute to them, in
the nature of things, but only in the corrupt imaginations of their
worshippers (see on Romans 1:21; Romans 1:21; 2 Chronicles 13:9). Your
"service" was a different bondage from that of the Jews,
which was a true service. Yet theirs, like yours, was a burdensome
yoke; how then is it ye wish to resume the yoke after that God has
transferred both Jews and Gentiles to a free service?
But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?
9. known God or rather are known of
God—They did not first know and love God, but God
first, in His electing love, knew and loved them as His, and
therefore attracted them to the saving knowledge of Him (Matthew 7:23;
1 Corinthians 8:3; 2 Timothy 2:19;
compare Exodus 33:12; Exodus 33:17;
John 15:16; Philippians 3:12).
God's great grace in this made their fall from it the more heinous.
how—expressing
indignant wonder at such a thing being possible, and even actually
occurring (Galatians 1:6). "How is
it that ye turn back again?"
weak—powerless to
justify: in contrast to the justifying power of faith (Galatians 1:6; compare Hebrews 7:18).
beggarly—contrasted
with the riches of the inheritance of believers in Christ (Hebrews 7:18). The state of the "child" (Hebrews 7:18) is weak, as not having attained manhood; "beggarly,"
as not having attained the inheritance.
elements—"rudiments."
It is as if a schoolmaster should go back to learning the A, B, C'S
[BENGEL].
again—There are two
Greek words in the original. "Ye desire again, beginning
afresh, to be in bondage." Though the Galatians, as
Gentiles, had never been under the Mosaic yoke, yet they had been
under "the elements of the world" (Hebrews 7:18): the common designation for the Jewish and Gentile systems
alike, in contrast to the Gospel (however superior the Jewish was to
the Gentile). Both systems consisted in outward worship and cleaved
to sensible forms. Both were in bondage to the elements of sense,
as though these could give the justification and sanctification which
the inner and spiritual power of God alone could bestow.
ye desire—or "will."
Will-worship is not acceptable to God (Colossians 2:18;
Colossians 2:23).
Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.
10. To regard the observance of
certain days as in itself meritorious as a work, is alien to the free
spirit of Christianity. This is not incompatible with observing the
Sabbath or the Christian Lord's day as obligatory, though not as a
work (which was the Jewish and Gentile error in the observance of
days), but as a holy mean appointed by the Lord for attaining the
great end, holiness. The whole life alike belongs to the Lord in the
Gospel view, just as the whole world, and not the Jews only, belong
to Him. But as in Paradise, so now one portion of time is needed
wherein to draw off the soul more entirely from secular business to
God (Colossians 2:16). "Sabbaths,
new moons, and set feasts" (1 Chronicles 23:31;
2 Chronicles 31:3), answer to "days,
months, times." "Months," however, may refer to the
first and seventh months, which were sacred on account
of the number of feasts in them.
times—Greek,
"seasons," namely, those of the three great feasts, the
Passover, Pentecost, and Tabernacles.
years—The sabbatical
year was about the time of writing this Epistle, A.D.
48 [BENGEL].
I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain.
11. lest—Greek, "lest
haply." My fear is not for my own sake, but for yours.
Brethren, I beseech you, be as I am; for I am as ye are: ye have not injured me at all.
12. be as I am—"As I have
in my life among you cast off Jewish habits, so do ye; for I am
become as ye are," namely, in the non-observance of legal
ordinances. "The fact of my laying them aside among Gentiles,
shows that I regard them as not at all contributing to
justification or sanctification. Do you regard them in the
same light, and act accordingly." His observing the law among
the Jews was not inconsistent with this, for he did so only in order
to win them, without compromising principle. On the other hand, the
Galatian Gentiles, by adopting legal ordinances, showed that they
regarded them as needful for salvation. This Paul combats.
ye have not injured me at
all—namely, at the period when I first preached the Gospel
among you, and when I made myself as you are, namely, living as a
Gentile, not as a Jew. You at that time did me no wrong; "ye
did not despise my temptation in the flesh" (): nay, you "received me as an angel of God." Then
in Galatians 4:16, he asks, "Have
I then, since that time, become your enemy by telling you the
truth?"
Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the first.
13. how through infirmity—rather,
as Greek, "Ye know that because of an infirmity of
my flesh I preached," c. He implies that bodily sickness,
having detained him among them, contrary to his original intentions,
was the occasion of his preaching the Gospel to them.
at the first—literally,
"at the former time" implying that at the time of
writing he had been twice in Galatia. See my
also see on Galatians 4:16, and Galatians 4:16. His sickness was probably the same as recurred more
violently afterward, "the thorn in the flesh" (Galatians 4:16), which also was overruled to good (2 Corinthians 12:9;
2 Corinthians 12:10), as the "infirmity
of the flesh" here.
And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.
14. my temptation—The oldest
manuscripts read, "your temptation." My infirmity, which
was, or might have been, a "temptation," or trial, to
you, ye despised not, that is, ye were not tempted by it to
despise me and my message. Perhaps, however, it is better to
punctuate and explain as LACHMANN,
connecting it with Galatians 4:13,
"And (ye know) your temptation (that is, the temptation to which
ye were exposed through the infirmity) which was in my flesh. Ye
despised not (through natural pride), nor rejected (through
spiritual pride), but received me," &c. "Temptation
does not mean here, as we now use the word, tendency to an evil
habit, but BODILY TRIAL."
as an angel of God—as a
heaven-inspired and sent messenger from God: angel
means "messenger" (Galatians 4:13). Compare the phrase, Galatians 4:13, a Hebrew and Oriental one for a person to be received with
the highest respect (Zechariah 12:8).
An angel is free from the flesh, infirmity, and temptation.
as Christ—being
Christ's representative (Zechariah 12:8). Christ is Lord of angels.
Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? for I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me.
15. Where, c.—Of what value
was your congratulation (so the Greek for "blessedness"
expresses) of yourselves, on account of your having among you me, the
messenger of the Gospel, considering how entirely you have veered
about since? Once you counted yourselves blessed in being
favored with my ministry.
ye would have plucked out
your own eyes—one of the dearest members of the body—so
highly did you value me: a proverbial phrase for the greatest
self-sacrifice (Matthew 5:29).
CONYBEARE and HOWSON
think that this particular form of proverb was used with reference to
a weakness in Paul's eyes, connected with a nervous frame, perhaps
affected by the brightness of the vision described, Acts 22:11
2 Corinthians 12:1-7. "You would
have torn out your own eyes to supply the lack of mine." The
divine power of Paul's words and works, contrasting with the
feebleness of his person (2 Corinthians 12:1-47), powerfully at first impressed the Galatians, who had all
the impulsiveness of the Celtic race from which they sprang.
Subsequently they soon changed with the fickleness which is equally
characteristic of Celts.
Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
16. Translate, "Am I then
become your enemy (an enemy in your eyes) by telling you the
truth" (Galatians 2:5; Galatians 2:14)?
He plainly did not incur their enmity at his first visit, and
the words here imply that he had since then, and before
his now writing, incurred it: so that the occasion of his telling
them the unwelcome truth, must have been at his second visit (Galatians 2:14, see my Galatians 2:14). The
fool and sinner hate a reprover. The righteous love faithful reproof
(Psalms 141:5; Proverbs 9:8).
They zealously affect you, but not well; yea, they would exclude you, that ye might affect them.
17. They—your flatterers: in
contrast to Paul himself, who tells them the truth.
zealously—zeal in
proselytism was characteristic especially of the Jews, and so of
Judaizers (Galatians 1:14; Matthew 23:15;
Romans 10:2).
affect you—that is,
court you (2 Corinthians 11:2).
not well—not in a good
way, or for a good end. Neither the cause of their zealous
courting of you, nor the manner, is what it ought to be.
they would exclude you—"They
wish to shut you out" from the kingdom of God (that is, they
wish to persuade you that as uncircumcised Gentiles, you are shut out
from it), "that ye may zealously court them," that
is, become circumcised, as zealous followers of themselves. ALFORD
explains it, that their wish was to shut out the Galatians from the
general community, and attract them as a separate clique to their own
party. So the English word "exclusive," is used.
But it is good to be zealously affected always in a good thing, and not only when I am present with you.
18. good to be zealously
affected—rather, to correspond to "zealously court"
in Galatians 4:18, "to be
zealously courted." I do not find fault with them for zealously
courting you, nor with you for being zealously courted:
provided it be "in a good cause" (translate so), "it
is a good thing" (Galatians 4:18). My reason for saying the "not well" (Galatians 4:18; the Greek is the same as that for "good,"
and "in a good cause," in Galatians 4:18), is that their zealous courting of you is not in a
good cause. The older interpreters, however, support English
Version (compare Galatians 1:14).
always—Translate and
arrange the words thus, "At all times, and not only when
I am present with you." I do not desire that I
exclusively should have the privilege of zealously courting you.
Others may do so in my absence with my full approval, if only it be
in a good cause, and if Christ be faithfully preached (Galatians 1:14).
My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,
19. My little children—
(1 Timothy 1:18; 2 Timothy 2:1;
1 John 2:1). My relation to you is
not merely that of one zealously courting you (Galatians 4:17;
Galatians 4:18), but that of a father
to his children (1 Corinthians 4:15).
I travail in birth—that
is, like a mother in pain till the birth of her child.
again—a second time.
The former time was when I was "present with you" (1 Corinthians 4:15; compare Note, see on 1 Corinthians 4:15).
Christ be formed in you—that
you may live nothing but Christ, and think nothing but Christ (1 Corinthians 4:15), and glory in nothing but Him, and His death, resurrection,
and righteousness (Philippians 3:8-10;
Colossians 1:27).
I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you.
20. Translate as Greek,
"I could wish." If circumstances permitted (which they do
not), I would gladly be with you [M. STUART].
now—as I was twice
already. Speaking face to face is so much more effective towards
loving persuasion than writing (2 John 1:12;
3 John 1:13; 3 John 1:14).
change my voice—as a
mother (Galatians 4:19): adapting my
tone of voice to what I saw in person your case might need. This is
possible to one present, but not to one in writing [GROTIUS
and ESTIUS].
I stand in doubt of
you—rather, "I am perplexed about you," namely, how
to deal with you, what kind of words to use, gentle or severe, to
bring you back to the right path.
Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
21. desire—of your own accord
madly courting that which must condemn and ruin you.
do ye not hear—do ye
not consider the mystic sense of Moses' words? [GROTIUS].
The law itself sends you away from itself to Christ [ESTIUS].
After having sufficiently maintained his point by argument, the
apostle confirms and illustrates it by an inspired allegorical
exposition of historical facts, containing in them general laws and
types. Perhaps his reason for using allegory was to confute the
Judaizers with their own weapons: subtle, mystical, allegorical
interpretations, unauthorized by the Spirit, were their favorite
arguments, as of the Rabbins in the synagogues. Compare the Jerusalem
Talmud [Tractatu Succa, cap. Hechalil]. Paul meets them with
an allegorical exposition, not the work of fancy, but sanctioned by
the Holy Spirit. History, if properly understood contains in its
complicated phenomena, simple and continually recurring divine
laws. The history of the elect people, like their legal
ordinances, had, besides the literal, a typical meaning (compare
1 Corinthians 10:1-4; 1 Corinthians 15:45;
1 Corinthians 15:47; Revelation 11:8).
Just as the extra-ordinarily-born Isaac, the gift of grace according
to promise, supplanted, beyond all human calculations, the
naturally-born Ishmael, so the new theocratic race, the spiritual
seed of Abraham by promise, the Gentile, as well as Jewish believers,
were about to take the place of the natural seed, who had imagined
that to them exclusively belonged the kingdom of God.
For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
22. (Genesis 16:3-16;
Genesis 21:2).
Abraham—whose sons ye
wish to be (compare Genesis 21:2).
a bond maid . . . a free
woman—rather, as Greek, "the bond maid . . . the
free woman."
But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
23. after the flesh—born
according to the usual course of nature: in contrast to Isaac, who
was born "by virtue of the promise" (so the Greek),
as the efficient cause of Sarah's becoming pregnant out of the course
of nature (Romans 4:19). Abraham
was to lay aside all confidence in the flesh (after which
Ishmael was born), and to live by faith alone in the promise
(according to which Isaac was miraculously born, contrary to all
calculations of flesh and blood).
Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
24. are an allegory—rather,
"are allegorical," that is, have another besides the
literal meaning.
these are the two
covenants—"these [women] are (that is, mean; omit
'the' with all the oldest manuscripts) two covenants." As among
the Jews the bondage of the mother determined that of the child, the
children of the free covenant of promise, answering to Sarah, are
free; the children of the legal covenant of bondage are not so.
one from—that is,
taking his origin from Mount Sinai. Hence, it appears,
he is treating of the moral law () chiefly (Hebrews 12:18).
Paul was familiar with the district of Sinai in Arabia (Hebrews 12:18), having gone thither after his conversion. At the gloomy
scene of the giving of the Law, he learned to appreciate, by
contrast, the grace of the Gospel, and so to cast off all his past
legal dependencies.
which gendereth—that
is, bringing forth children unto bondage. Compare the phrase
(Acts 3:25), "children of
the covenant which God made . . . saying unto Abraham."
Agar—that is, Hagar.
For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
25. Translate, "For this
word, Hagar, is (imports) Mount Sinai in Arabia (that is,
among the Arabians—in the Arabian tongue)." So
CHRYSOSTOM explains.
Haraut, the traveller, says that to this day the Arabians call Sinai,
"Hadschar," that is, Hagar, meaning a rock or
stone. Hagar twice fled into the desert of Arabia (Genesis 16:1-16;
Genesis 21:9-21): from her the
mountain and city took its name, and the people were called
Hagarenes. Sinai, with its rugged rocks, far removed from the
promised land, was well suited to represent the law which inspires
with terror, and the spirit of bondage.
answereth—literally,
"stands in the same rank with"; "she corresponds to."
Jerusalem which now is—that
is, the Jerusalem of the Jews, having only a present temporary
existence, in contrast with the spiritual Jerusalem of the Gospel,
which in germ, under the form of the promise, existed ages
before, and shall be for ever in ages to come.
and—The oldest
manuscripts read, "For she is in bondage." As Hagar
was in bondage to her mistress, so Jerusalem that now is, is in
bondage to the law, and also to the Romans: her civil state thus
being in accordance with her spiritual state [BENGEL].
But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
26. This verse stands instead of
the sentence which we should expect, to correspond to , "One from Mount Sinai," namely, the other
covenant from the heavenly mount above, which is (answers in the
allegory to) Sarah.
Jerusalem . . . above—
(Hebrews 12:22), "the
heavenly Jerusalem." "New Jerusalem, which cometh down out
of heaven from my God" (Revelation 3:12;
Revelation 21:2). Here "the
Messianic theocracy, which before Christ's second appearing is
the Church, and after it, Christ's kingdom of glory"
[MEYER].
free—as Sarah was;
opposed to "she is in bondage" (Revelation 21:2).
all—omitted in many of
the oldest manuscripts, though supported by some. "Mother of
us," namely, believers who are already members of the
invisible Church, the heavenly Jerusalem, hereafter to be manifested
(Hebrews 12:22).
For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
27. ().
thou barren—Jerusalem
above: the spiritual Church of the Gospel, the fruit of "the
promise," answering to Sarah, who bore not "after
the flesh": as contrasted with the law, answering to Hagar, who
was fruitful in the ordinary course of nature. Isaiah speaks
primarily of Israel's restoration after her long-continued
calamities; but his language is framed by the Holy Spirit so as to
reach beyond this to the spiritual Zion: including not only the Jews,
the natural descendants of Abraham and children of the law, but also
the Gentiles. The spiritual Jerusalem is regarded as "barren"
while the law trammeled Israel, for she then had no spiritual
children of the Gentiles.
break forth—into
crying.
cry—shout for joy.
many more—Translate as
Greek, "Many are the children of the desolate (the New
Testament Church made up in the greater part from the Gentiles, who
once had not the promise, and so was destitute of God as her
husband), more than of her which hath an (Greek, 'THE')
husband (the Jewish Church having GOD
for her husband, Isaiah 54:5;
Jeremiah 2:2)." Numerous as were
the children of the legal covenant, those of the Gospel covenant are
more so. The force of the Greek article is, "Her who has
THE husband of which the
other is destitute."
Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
28. we—The oldest manuscripts
and versions are divided between "we" and "ye."
"We" better accords with , "mother of us."
children of promise—not
children after the flesh, but through the promise (Galatians 4:23;
Galatians 4:29; Galatians 4:31).
"We are" so, and ought to wish to continue so.
But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
29. persecuted—Ishmael
"mocked" Isaac, which contained in it the germ and spirit
of persecution (Genesis 21:9). His
mocking was probably directed against Isaac's piety and faith in
God's promises. Being the older by natural birth, he haughtily prided
himself above him that was born by promise: as Cain hated Abel's
piety.
him . . . born after the
Spirit—The language, though referring primarily to Isaac, born
in a spiritual way (namely, by the promise or word of God, rendered
by His Spirit efficient out of the course of nature, in making Sarah
fruitful in old age), is so framed as especially to refer to
believers justified by Gospel grace through faith, as opposed to
carnal men, Judaizers, and legalists.
even so it is now—
(Galatians 5:11; Galatians 6:12;
Galatians 6:17; Acts 9:29;
Acts 13:45; Acts 13:49;
Acts 13:50; Acts 14:1;
Acts 14:2; Acts 14:19;
Acts 17:5; Acts 17:13;
Acts 18:5; Acts 18:6).
The Jews persecuted Paul, not for preaching Christianity in
opposition to heathenism, but for preaching it as distinct from
Judaism. Except in the two cases of Philippi and Ephesus (where the
persons beginning the assault were pecuniarily interested in his
expulsion), he was nowhere set upon by the Gentiles, unless they were
first stirred up by the Jews. The coincidence between Paul's Epistles
and Luke's history (the Acts) in this respect, is plainly undesigned,
and so a proof of genuineness (see PALEY,
Horæ Paulinæ).
Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
30. Genesis 21:10;
Genesis 21:12, where Sarah's words
are, "shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac."
But what was there said literally, is here by inspiration expressed
in its allegorical spiritual import, applying to the New Testament
believer, who is antitypically "the son of the free woman."
In John 8:35; John 8:36,
Jesus refers to this.
Cast out—from the house
and inheritance: literally, Ishmael; spiritually, the carnal and
legalists.
shall not be heir—The
Greek is stronger, "must not be heir," or
"inherit."
So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
31. So then—The oldest
manuscripts read, "Wherefore." This is the conclusion
inferred from what precedes. In Galatians 3:29;
Galatians 4:7, it was established that
we, New Testament believers, are "heirs." If, then, we are
heirs, "we are not children of the bond woman (whose son,
according to Scripture, was 'not to be heir,' Galatians 4:7), but of the free woman (whose son was, according to
Scripture, to be heir). For we are not "cast out" as
Ishmael, but accepted as sons and heirs.